this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
Casual Conversation
3346 readers
248 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, a lot of it comes down to what's on the floor, and how aware you are of risks
Truth be told, a pill isn't going to pick up anything that's going to hurt you in the amount of time it takes to pick it up, unless you're in a location that is highly contaminated. And if you're in that kind of place, you wouldn't be taking a pill inside to begin with, you'd be geared up.
But, floors are what we walk on. When we walk, every step picks things up, and the next puts some of it down.
As such, anything could be there, from something as innocuous as sand to as bad as the eggs of a parasite. If someone isn't following good practices and is walking around in the wrong places they could track in anything, even crazy shit in a hypothetical, like uranium dust or whatever.
Your average household though, you're maybe going to be dealing with mild chemicals in small amounts, some e-coli, maybe some tetanus, and the usual assortment of bacteria, fungi and particulates that are everywhere anyway. So, if what you drop isn't going to carry enough of any of that into your mouth to disturb the microflora already present, it won't matter.
Thing is, the wetter something is, the more it's going to pick up, and the more likely it is to carry it to your mouth. A pill isn't picking much up, and some will fall off. A piece of bologna is picking up a lot and it'll stick.
So, it's all about risk management. There's some really dangerous stuff on even very clean floors sometimes. If you're walking in and out a lot, the risks go up that something bad will be there. Me? I'm at least going to thoroughly wash that bologna if I starving and I can't afford to replace it. Then cook it to hopefully kill anything left behind. But a pill? I'd have done exactly what you did because the risk is so low it isn't worth worrying about.
How would those get on some shoes, then on a floor, and never get seen?
Because they're tiny. Some are invisible without magnification. Even the bigger ones are smaller than a grain of rice, and an unusually small grain at that.
All it takes is walking through dirt that's been exposed to something infected. It doesn't even have to be where an animal poops directly on the spot, some eggs can handle being washed away during rain to somewhere else. Which means that even pavement isn't completely risk free where avoiding bare ground would help.
You ever watch crime shows where they bring up Locard's principle? The idea is that no matter where you go or what you do, you will transfer something from one place to the next. That something may be indistinguishable from the environment, but we're swimming through clouds of dust and microbes every step we take.
Every step you take, barefoot or shod, you're in contact with something. Teeny tiny pieces will be picked up. It may fall off the very next step, or a dozen later, but you're carrying things along, even on the slickest, smoothest shoes. There's little microscopic textures that grab things.
An egg for a parasite is usually going to be great at sticking to things. That's how they find new hosts. Some of them can survive for scary amounts of time in fairly difficult conditions.
The question isn't whether or not you've ever carried something like that into your house, it's how many and how often.