this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
184 points (91.8% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2911 readers
15 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And… forgive me for saying so, but they’re tedious, at best. That’s not punching down on anyone’s identity. It’s a commentary on how such neologisms make parsing a sentence far less reflexive and a good bit more unnecessarily arcane, without actually communicating any level of additional meaningful information or context.

[–] Noel_Skum 1 points 5 days ago

Yup, I pretty much agree with all that you say.

[–] skulblaka 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's quite easy, when you read "drag", it means "I", that's literally the extent of it.

But let's dig into this a little. Your argument covers literally half of all words. Let's take this comment as an example, we want to strip everything out of it that doesn't communicate.

Tedious. No insult, but. Many words make sentence long, add no value.

No one adheres to this because it makes you sound like a damn caveman. But if you feel so strongly about this, that's how you prune all the unnecessary cognitive load from your speech.

But if replacing one meaningless pronoun with another meaningless pronoun is so arcane that you can't parse the meaning of the sentence afterward, there's always the option of just not engaging with it. It doesn't harm you or anyone else and it isn't hate speech so just let people express themselves how they want to.

I also find Picasso's cubist paintings to be tedious to look at but you don't see me trying to tell him that he's painting The Weeping Woman the wrong way.