this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
-12 points (22.7% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2884 readers
146 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Someone on Reddit has been saying someone has been able to report new members without proof and remove their threads by claiming to be the people they've reported. Out of curiosity, I tested this out. Turns out it checks out. For some reason, admins have allowed it to be possible. I found out my threads have been removed this way, so beware if you're banned from somewhere or your threads are removed. This is the same person who thinks she can compete with Fedilore on Tumblr after being banned from Fedilore's instance for signing up for KiwiFarms in order to prevent her friends from being backbitten on there before going on YouTube to complain about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Nothing in the modlogs says that Leni was banned for being autistic, the sole exception being Leni banning themselves on their ShiverMeTimbers alt, where they used autism in the reason box as an attempt to discredit the existing modlogs.

Did either of them sign up for KiwiFarms for protective or sadistic purposes?

Users have to agree to a security question that includes slurs against marginalised demographics before they can sign up on KiwiFarms. The site makes no effort to hide what it's goal is. Leni referred to people on there as "lolcows". They also said that someone dislikes the site because they're probably from two demographics who see themselves at odds with it, which was very obviously referring to both autistic and transgender people, since those are the people the site targets the most.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You keep talking about autism, but all I see is a URL linking to an article. It looks like the person who banned her is using it as a cue. The modlogs have been wrong before, with or without Leni or the people who everyone claims are her alts.

Users have to agree to a security question that includes slurs against marginalised demographics before they can sign up on KiwiFarms. The site makes no effort to hide what it’s goal is.

Alright, first off, how would you know this if you are banned from KiwiFarms on account of being English? You strike me as a liar now. Considering you're the one here who actually acts like they would be on KiwiFarms, including with downvoting people using alts, I am beginning to have suspicions about you.

Second, I opened up the page for it out of curiosity. At least on my device, what you describe isn't there.

Third, "lolcow" isn't always a slur. It comes from "lol" and "cow", and combined, it makes a word that means "someone you can depend on to be humorous". The "cow" part refers to "milking" as a metaphor. The word "lolcow" is used as a part of the rules of Anonymous.

You have claimed before you are a part of Anonymous while not being on KiwiFarms but just now proved the reverse is true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I've never been a KiwiFarms user. I know what I know about the site from reading up on it, after the suicide of Near/Byuu, whose death was directly caused through harassment from KiwiFarms. The fact you jumped straight to me being a liar rather than considering this is making me think you didn't create this thread to have a honest discussion with others.

You have claimed before you are a part of Anonymous

I've never claimed this either.

Please don't put words in my mouth.

The modlogs have been wrong before

One or two mods, sure, I could believe it. But we aren't talking about just one or two mods, we're talking dozens of different mod and admins banning Leni, all on different instances. As an example, the modlogs aren't wrong about Leni's Nazi apologia since they commented 50+ times in this thread, defending both the AfD and Elon's Nazi salutes.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By banned, I meant that you cannot access the site due to claiming to live in the UK. Criticize the website if you want, I am just stating my observations. They contradict you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are no contradictions. People can know about how KiwiFarms operates without being a user on it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean what people say cannot contradict with what people can see with their own eyes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where did I contradict myself?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are trying to speak for what people see when they register. I am looking right at it, it's not there.

Keep in mind as a side note that the R word is not a slur in most countries, and that many of the slurs some people do say on there are reclaimed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are trying to speak for what people see when they register. I am looking right at it, it’s not there.

I trust what I've read about the site, including what I've read on RationalWiki. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

Most "cows" are described as what are known as "exceptional individuals", coined after a post filter was installed to replace the word "r----s". On its now-banned Twitter account, Kiwi Farms described its purpose as "gossip and exploitation of the mentally handicapped for amusement purposes".[17] Furthermore, the sign-up page for the site once came with a disclaimer saying "autistics will be laughed at. T----s will be misgendered. People will try to find where you live."[18] Due to its offensive content, Kiwi Farms is arguably a hate speech website.

Keep in mind as a side note that the R word is not a slur in most countries

Conversion "therapy" isn't considered bad in most countries either. Defending slurs is not a good look.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I trust what I’ve read about the site, including what I’ve read on RationalWiki.

So you'd willfully rather trust second-hand information (possibly from an old source) over second-hand information from someone you are talking to right now and even first-hand information? And from RationalWiki, a website with notoriety for biased interpretation?

Conversion “therapy” isn’t considered bad in most countries either. Defending slurs is not a good look.

What are you getting at? Conversion therapy is banned in most countries. I don't make the rules, I'm just telling you most countries don't consider it a slur (why then randomly bring up conversion therapy, something that is definitely banned and definitely has a reason to). That's just not a good argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to trust reliable sources. I'd rather trust those than someone who the modlogs say is an alt of a KiwiFarms member, since KiwiFarms members are known for not being the most honest people around.

Conversion therapy is banned in most countries.

It's only banned in a handful of countries, actually.

I’m just telling you most countries don’t consider it a slur

That is no justification for using slurs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

reliable

Uh huh. Right.

Funnily enough, Rational Wiki doesn't have many good things to say about Lemmy in general, including that it's not always trustworthy when conflict arises. Would you risk half of the things you've said so far here to die on the hill that it's a reliable source?

Also, I meant most civilized countries, the ones willing to place such laws. And go ahead and try convincing a country that slurs are never okay when that country doesn't believe in those slurs in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, that's right. Most other sites are much more reliable than KiwiFarms and its userbase are. I'm glad we've come to an agreement on this.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was talking about RationalWiki, not KiwiFarms. You are quoting RationalWiki claiming they're quoting KiwiFarms. This is a strawman.

As for the conversion therapy part, I meant most civilized countries, the ones willing to place such laws. Try convincing a country that slurs are never okay when that country doesn’t believe in those slurs in the first place. It doesn't usually work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You said "most countries" with no mention of perceived civility.

KiwiFarms is a site that was created for hate speech. It is an extremist site by design. The userbase and the owner of a hate speech site are going to be maliciously biased for it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

So is RationalWiki.

I would say this about all platforms. If you want to see what a platform says, ask the platform.

The platform, at this moment, does not say what you claim it says. That is my point with that. It's not up for argument when anyone can see for themselves.

Show me your source for your new claim now.