this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
321 points (89.8% liked)

Greentext

6297 readers
2661 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] untakenusername 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm actually pissed Bitcoin is so deflationary because that incentives people to invest and hold it, and sure that causes the price to rise a ton, but it also lowers the pressure on people to sell it, making it less like a currency and more like an investment.

Satoshi low-key just wanted to be rich, otherwise there wouldn't have been a cap on the number of Bitcoins that can exist

good thing there's other currencies that actually don't suck

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, it is sad to see that many of crypto-coin project are handled as trading assets and not as what it started with: open currency. I would love to see more stability so that cryptocurrencies can be used for buying stuff more easily.

otherwise there wouldn't have been a cap on the number of Bitcoins that can exist

there are other reasons for this: an uncapped coin is inflationary, so it can loose its value given enough time, no matter what happens to the economy around it. But then again, many projects without a cap try to set the emission-rate so that it somewhat balances creation with burn (for example by lost wallets or transactions to invalid addresses).

[–] untakenusername 5 points 1 week ago

I really prefer that second option to cause deflation because it allows currencies to be only slightly deflationary, but not too much like bitcoin which has just turned into an investment