this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
577 points (99.1% liked)

Games

38586 readers
1600 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ps1 is great because it's a mips core, a funky 3d engine and the main weirdness is the spu.

The n64 is all weird (albeit with a similar but 64bit mips core).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The PlayStation hardware is barely capable of 3D at all.

Sure, it can accelerate some polygon math, but that's about it. No texture mapping, no Z depth, no floating point precision, no anti-aliasing, no shading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It does texture mapping but that's all. I think it does very limited, basically gouraud shading.

You have to clip your triangles, basically clip everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It does texture mapping, it's just not perspective correct. And floating point isn't a precision

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

and floating point isn't a precision

Floating point precision does not mean I'm saying "floating point is a precision", whatever that sentence means.

The PlayStation can't use anything but integers to place points in 3D space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Don't forget the rdram in the N64 that Sony didn't use until PS2/3