this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
469 points (97.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20642 readers
276 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Minimizing risk", if you're not psychic, involves safety gear.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree, I just meant to point out that there is a fuzzy limit between when you need protection and when you don't. Consider the story (unsure if true) about when someone scolded Tony Hawk for carrying his child while skating down the street: For most people, that would be foolishly risky, but Tony Hawk is about as likely to fall while skating down the street as an ordinary person is while walking.

Likewise, Alex Honnold does a bunch of climbing with protection, but also does climbs that no one else would consider without it. However, climbing a 6c for him is probably comparable to someone ordinary climbing a 4 (or even less). Even I've climbed some short 4-routes without gear as parts of a hike (never more than maybe 5-10m), and wouldn't have done it if I didn't feel safe doing it.

Of course, I think he probably pushes the limit a bit beyond what's reasonable, my point is just that it's probably not as foolishly risky as a lot of people think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i minimize risk by never coming closer to a ledge than my own height above the ground, unless there's a fence. FFFFFFFFFFuck that shit.

i'll peer just my eyes over a ledge while crawling. maybe.