this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
453 points (97.7% liked)
solarpunk memes
4134 readers
911 users here now
For when you need a laugh!
The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!
But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.
Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.
Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines
Have fun!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is such an amazing response to debate-lord π
Calling it "wish-fulfilment" doesn't help and makes it sound like you're not actually asking for an answer.
Who exactly was wishing for such a sad scenario to be true?
No
I didnt downvote you. I'm not going to do research for you. Linking a book review should be enough to prove it wasn't pulled out of this air.
The review goes over some of the methodology.
I'm not saying that.
Edit: if you're saying it's based on nothing then I expect you to have looked into it, yes
Do memes need burden of proof?
There is no secret agenda here. Its just a dumb meme. You can a meme with the words "shifting baseline syndrome" if you want. In fact you can put whatever you want in a meme.
Maybe... Maybe the memes community isn't for you.
Because you asked for it? Someone posted a dumb meme and didn't cite it with studies and now you are mad. You do have some burden since you are the one who started the discussion on proof in the first place. If you can't even be bothered to look at the proof they bring, its not their problem.
Dude, you said show "proof" and he showed proof. Dunno what you are complaining about. How was he supposed to prove anything without linking to an external source?
Assuming you're not just trolling peopke who care about the environment, I have an actual evidence based answer here, current levels of biomass in the ocean aren't really known, and are difficult to estimate[0]. They're very widely regarded as dropping heavily as a result of human interference and climate change.
I think you might be misreading the comic though, which I think is more an explanation a shifting baseline, where the first panel is compared to the second, rather than the first which would be the correct reference point for a natural population[1].
It's almost certainly not meant to be representative of the actual species, aside from anything else the size ratio between say, pufferfish, turtles and whales are obviously wrong, but again, I don't think the comic is trying to pretend it's accurate in that respect.
[0] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867419312747#bib8
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shifting_baseline
For example by looking at historical fishing records. One paper that does this back into the 1750s across mulpile regions and species is this one:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.011
It is behind a pay wall, but I'll quote the methods here:
P.s: Is there good way to share the whole pdf?
Do you have evidence that oceans were less plentiful in the past? Or are you just taking a contrarian position because it's easy?
if you can dismiss the proofless infograph without proof, I can dismiss your dismissal without proof. We can go on recursively all day.
Look, if this were a publication in a scientific journal, sure.
But it's not. It's a webforum. In casual conversation, you can gesture to the idea that there was more sealife before mechanization, pollution, and industrial fishing becacasue... yeah. Duh. Of course there was.
Your whole attitude has been bad faith from the beginning. I think your curiosity would have gone over a lot better had you stopped before saying "Or is this just wish-fulfillment hogwash?"
I don't see why you had to start off so combative.
There's lots of fish species in danger of going extinct
I appreciate you. fuck the haters
This comment was reported, but I'll leave it in tact because it lends itself to the conversation and you weren't a dick with response afterwards