this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
605 points (97.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21286 readers
566 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CidVicious 65 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is a little bit unfair to paleoartists. A lot of the drawings people are most familiar with came from a time when there was less evidence for feathers. They absolutely update drawings as more fossils are found that change the picture, but we don't always go and look at the newest art. Just how much feather cover specific dinosaurs would have had is still a bit unknown but it's unlikely they would have had anywhere near as much feather cover as modern birds.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have to disagree with that last point. Dinosaurs lasted a LONG time, and while.early dinosaurs certainly had little feather coverage, such as stegosaurus, later dinosaurs, such as yutyrannus and therozinosaurus, were absolutely covered.

Now, there were not "feathers", but feather like structures that eventually evolved into feathers in their descendants

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's a feather like structure look like?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Small, flaky scales that protruded out from the body

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds like reptiles to me. Something like a sort of cross between fish and snakes?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I love the art in Dinosaurs: New Visions of a Lost World. Such an amazing book!



(Sinosauropteryx, archeopteryx and anurognathus. And BTW the colours are accurate. We can find out now.)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sorry but that last one is just so fucking goofy looking. If that thing came to attack me I would just die of laughter and it would then be able to eat me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why would it attack you? It was the size of a budgie. Really doubt a budgie would be able to eat you no matter how hard it would try.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I mean, really depends on the time period. Bugs are a surprisingly bad frame of size reference depending on the time period. Tha little insect might actually be human sized ^^'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Who knows. Animals can behave strangely sometimes. I also missed the bug so I had no idea how big it would be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a successful hunting tactic to me