this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1379 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59581 readers
2996 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers jailbreak a Tesla to get free in-car feature upgrades::A group of researchers found a way to hack a Tesla's hardware with the goal of getting free in-car upgrades, such as heated rear seats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Hardware companies trying to copy the software companies with a subscription model really sucks. What's next? Intel charging a monthly fee to unlock 5 GHz boost? Nvidia charging a monthly fee if you want to do anything AI-related with their GPUs? Samsung and LG charging a monthly fee if you want to use a TV or a monitor for more than 2 hours a day? Greed knows no bounds.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, Intel tried something similar already in 2010 (way before their pay-as-you-go bullshit). It was a Pentium that you could unlock hyper-threading on for $50.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully they sold terribly, but one has to wonder how long until they try it again

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That model is here already for cloud computing, literally dollars for CPU cores and bandwidth and memory. But that only works out well for renting other people's servers and would be bad for any product that you purchase outright. I suggest we all not buy those products if they do that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure intel do something like that with their server CPUs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I hope no execs are reading this thread because if they had these ideas they'd have no qualms about implementing them

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This isn't unusual for Enterprise grade IT hardware. Mainframes have been sold/licensed that way for decades. I recently dealt with a performance issue that we solved by buying a license to use more of a piece of hardware that was already in our data center (we didn't realize the piece we owned had twice the capacity that could be unlocked just through licensing till we engaged the vendor)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is that not what the K versions of their processors are? Pay more for the ability to overclock and get good speeds