this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
359 points (98.9% liked)

World News

45858 readers
3006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 145 points 4 days ago (55 children)

I keep saying it all the time

It isn't about the QUANTITY of life

It's about the QUALITY of life

What sense does it make if you raise your population and everyone is miserably poor or on the edge of becoming poor?

It makes more sense if you just concentrate on making life more manageable, comfortable and sensible for the population you already have. Once you have a comfortable stable population of people who no longer worry about their future .... then they will be more likely to have a family.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (22 children)

It makes more sense if you just concentrate on making life more manageable, comfortable and sensible for the population you already have.

And working age people are necessary to make (and keep) life manageable, comfortable and sensible. This isn't a hypothetical; they're suffering the effects already. We'd need to lean a lot more into automation before society can function as an inverse pyramid.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

Or, we could transition away from people doing made up jobs that don't need to exist to doing things that actually need to get done

[–] Supernova1051 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'd be interested to hear what you think a made up job is

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Japan is notorious for unnecessarily complicated supply chains to bolster employment. And for unnecessarily ripping up perfectly fine pavement and concreting hillsides that don’t need it. Again, to bolster employment.

There are many, many, BS jobs in Japan.

And they still struggle with youth unemployment.

Fewer people would be a godsend.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

If only. US productivity is soaring but workers’ share of GDP isn’t. And we have chronic underemployment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Things like medical billing where the vast majority of the profession exists because we've created a labyrinth to be navigated that doesn't need to exist.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)