this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
342 points (99.4% liked)

Television

651 readers
325 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Klear 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Devil's advocate: it's a good thing to change things up a bit in an adaptation, both to keep old fans on their toes and maybe come up with new ideas and interpretations.

I had a similar reaction to the s1 ending but I was going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they have some idea of how to work with this.

My big issue came a bit later, when they had Homelander kill Stillwell. To me the main point of the comics was that all the capes were ultimately a non-issue, a theatre. Stilwell was THE most dangerous, evil and scary character, personifying Vogue.

And they replaced him (her, I guess) basically with some comic relief idiots afterwards.

[–] southsamurai 3 points 1 day ago

I'm actually okay with changes, when they don't mess up the "spirit" of the characters, and don't totally blow apart a plot

But, yeah, Stillwell, that's such a horrible choice to kill him off at all, much less that way. I had quit watching, but you pick up bits and pieces anyway, and hearing that had made me glad I had already stopped