this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
521 points (96.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

22112 readers
964 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 days ago (2 children)

python has way too many ways to do that. asyncio, future, thread, multiprocessing...

[–] WolfLink 40 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Of the ways you listed the only one that will actually take advantage of a multi core CPU is multiprocessing

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yup, that's true. most meaningful tasks are io-bound so "parallel" basically qualifies as "whatever allows multiple threads of execution to keep going". if you're doing numbercrunching in pythen without a proper library like pandas, that can parallelize your calculations, you're doing it wrong.

[–] WolfLink 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I’ve used multiprocessing to squeeze more performance out of numpy and scipy. But yeah, resorting to multiprocessing is a sign that you should be dropping into something like Rust or a C variant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Most numpy array functions already utilize multiple cores, because they're optimized and written in C

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've always hated object oriented multi threading. Goroutines (green threads) are just the best way 90% of the time. If I need to control where threads go I'll write it in rust.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

nothing about any of those libraries dictates an OO approach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Meh, even Java has decent FP paradigm support these days. Just because you can do everything in an OO way in Java doesn't mean you need to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I have to put a thread object in a variable and call a method on it to start it then it's OO multi threading. I don't want to know when the thread spawns, I don't want to know what code it's running, and I don't want to know when it's done. I just want shit to happen at the same time (90% of the time)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

the thread library is aping the posix thread interface with python semantics.