this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1375 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

13467 readers
3851 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Is nobody concerned that illegal experiments on babies only gets you 3 years?

Maybe they were Uyghurs so it was classified as "property damage" in Chinese law.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Be careful, you might get banned from lemmy dot ml for hatespeech against dictatorships.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It's literal misinformation, so it probably should be removed, yes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why did you self censor by saying "dot"?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I wrote that on my phone's touch keyboard, and I didn't want to use \. to escape the dot character to avoid autohotlinking.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 23 hours ago

I've blocked that instance, but if they need more material to ban me I have it.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago

Who cares about a tankie instance?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The devil is in the details....

You are likely thinking (as I am) that he implanted robotic arms on babies but he may have just rubbed sage oil on them for all we know

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He used CRISPR to make babies immune to HIV.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, he inserted a gene that is associated with resistance to HIV, but is also associated with increased risk of some cancers. He did this without informed consent, he did this without running it by an ethics board, he did this without knowing whether it would work or not.

Let’s stop pretending that he’s a good guy that just magically made HIV immune babies.

Edit: it also didn’t work. The babies have genes both with and without the mutation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

We also don't know if it was just that gene that was altered, or if there are other effects. Modern gene editing isn't so precise that we can edit just the gene we want. A lot of genes with similar sequences as the target can also be affected.

It's basically like firing a shotgun at the house they live in. You might hit the one you want, but you may also hit other unrelated genes in the process.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente 3 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thanks for the info

definitely on the evil side considering he probably planed to infect them to test his theories

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Nope, he had no plans to infect them. The babies had parents who were HIV-positive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow you are jumping to a lot of stupid ass conclusions for someone who won't google a name.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine, give him your baby to experiment then

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Did not have baby zombie apocalypse on my Bingo card, but there ya go

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_Jiankui_affair

Laws were changed after this incident:

In 2020, the National People's Congress of China passed Civil Code and an amendment to Criminal Law that prohibit human gene editing and cloning with no exceptions

So, in case you actually meant that weird ignorant remark you made about Uyghurs, the answer is no and no.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Lemmitors downvoting you because actually learning about the case conflicts with their "cHiNa BaD" circlejerk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks for the information -- good to know. I assume that like American law, he couldn't be punished for something that wasn't illegal when he did it?

Regarding the Uyghur comment the other guy made, definitely a bit tasteless but I don't think it's that ignorant given the genocide China perpetrated against them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

What he did was illegal. Even without specific laws about genetic modification or cloning, he did perform experiments with babies without the necessity approvals from ethics and safety, without informed consent from the parents and likely misusing funds allocated to other research.

3 years is still to short.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

he couldn’t be punished for something that wasn’t illegal when he did it?

I don't think CCP cares about the principle of no ex post facto punishments.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 23 hours ago

It was a joke... You don't get to jail for experimenting with slaves in China.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Depends how successful the experiment is (and probably on what the goal is as well).

If he'd been testing the effects of grass vs grain feed on human fat marbling, I'd imagine the sentence would have been a little more severe

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

And China executed a shitload of people for political dissent...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And in what context medical experiments should be allowed on babies ?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

A lot of contexts? Like the development depending on formula vs mother's milk? Experimenting doesn't need to mean vivisection or injecting unregulated drugs, but if you need to do the experiments illegally, I'm not sure it was something "safe"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yet we still have default circumcisions in the US, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Not babies, embyros