this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
234 points (99.2% liked)

Europe

4319 readers
1370 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The rallying call to put European tech first — backed by companies including Airbus, Element, OVHCloud, Murena, Nextcloud, and Proton, to name a few — follows the shock of the Munich security conference, where U.S. Vice President JD Vance tore into Europe like an attack dog, leaving delegates in no doubt that the post-War international order is in tatters and all bets are off when it comes to what the U.S. might do under President Donald Trump.

Key tech infrastructure that’s owned and operated by U.S. companies doesn’t look like such a solid buy, from a European perspective, if a presidential executive order can be issued forcing U.S. firms to switch off service provision or terminate a supply chain at a pen stroke.

“Imagine Europe without internet search, email, or office software. It would mean the complete breakdown of our society. Sounds unrealistic? Well, something similar just happened to Ukraine,” Wolfgang Oels, COO of the Berlin-based, tree-planting search engine Ecosia — one signatory to the letter that was already taking steps aimed at reducing its dependency on U.S. Big Tech suppliers — tells TechCrunch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"European tech industry calls for buying European tech" like no shit? I entirely agree, but what else would they suggest?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My guess they recognise they lack visibility: People think there are no alternatives to big tech but other than hardware we’re not that dependent, especially in software. It’s a matter of switching to local or open alternatives which are ready now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yet government moves to Linux fall because it's complicated. It's not that simple unfortunately.

There needs to be a driving force (eg. Like china pushing it's os, or maybe this one with captain orange)

Everything is driven by the end user. And unfortunately we are a gray continent so the younger generation must start.

Alternatively I can't get my wife out of an iPhone because a Samsung is just to confusing.

What I can do in the background I do but it has to be easy and recognizable for 75% of the population.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Those failed Linux moves happened because governments are cheap and defer entire digitisation to municipalities and other local forms of government. It’s like there’s no planning of anything anymore („free market will solve everything”). It sounds ridiculous but even effing North Korea knows better.

If they were serious about it they’d hire couple of dozen open source software contributors first, do a small scale trial run where you iron out the kinks and submit patches where necessary and only then roll this out to regular govt clerks.

You can’t expect projects running on a shoestring budget to provide you with commercial grade solutions. Of course if you hire a big corpo that will promise you everything above but those somehow always turn out to be scams.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They went through the effort of creating their own fork, Limux. It has nothing to do with money (cant find the amount of money invested on the implementation btw) or deferring anything. No need to attach the process there. Yes, i'm sure there were some issues with printers and other stuff but that could be solved by replacement.

The problem was not Limux. The problem were the users as i pointed out. The Gray people and the "touchscreen" people that are stuck on something are going to rebel. As said before, your users need to be able to work with it and like it.

I consulted on multiple implementations and the main thing that matters to people for acceptance is: "is it sexy?". If its sexy, people will adopt it easier. Linux at that time was generally looking blegh.

  • Thunderbird -> Not sexy
  • Firefox -> debatable, but not to sexy
  • Limux with KDE -> absolutely not sexy
  • OpenOffice --> Not sexy

Users have to get used to something different, big hurdle. When looking at it, it looks like garbage, no interest.

It all depends on acceptance.

It could be that it would succeed now because the UI has come a long way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

All you say is true but not impossible to solve with adequate funding. I’d argue that Windows and Office is so user hostile these days that the barrier to entry is much lower than usual. Have you tried to save a file in Excel in the last year or so? It’s like Office Guantanamo and people are increasingly fed up