Asklemmy

46530 readers

970 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

291

DAE feel like DuckDuckGo is now just as good as google for the vast majority of searches? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This isn't the gotcha you think it is. There's a slight difference in using a well established acronym vs. a personally made-up one 😅

You're essentially getting upset that someone used a word that you aren't familiar with. With that, you're comparing someone using this unfamiliar word to the use of a non-existant word.

When you encounter a word you dont know, you look it up in a dictionary. You don't call out the author on their communication skills (rudely, mind you).

I'm really trying to be cordial here, and I really don't mean to cause upset, but you must see where I'm coming from, no?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Acrynoms aren’t words. Your argument is moot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Way to completely miss my point. For someone who touts communication, your skills are severely lacking. Have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

May you have a nice day as well. You should try not to take things so personally. If you'd like to learn how and when you use Abbreviations and Acronyms you can do so here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/journalism_and_journalistic_writing/ap_style.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Christ, how insufferable. I dont know what I expected. Welcome to the block list I guess.