this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
87 points (95.8% liked)
Fedibridge
406 readers
271 users here now
A community to organize and discuss the growth of the fediverse as a whole
Related communities
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe take the approach of showing very simple federation first, with as little text as possible (i.e. One short statement describing each graphic element), and perhaps only 3 "houses". Because in the end, anything beyond that is just duplicating the same thing (yea, there's more, but for an info graphic it really doesn't matter).
You have no choice but to lose accuracy. You can either present a high-level, abstract/conceptual view of something, or present more detail. Getting the concept across first is essential; no one's gonna grok any detail without the conceptual framework to hang it on.
Also, is that second house the same as the first house? It seems like you're showing the owner of the house using a second graphic. That kind of info would work better perhaps on the right side, so you have internet user on left, and house owner on right. It makes for two clearly separate concepts.
I'd also give the characters names. "House owner" is harder for someone to keep in their head than "Bob". Maybe internet user is Karen. Etc. "Karen uses Bob's server to chat with people" is a lot easier to think about than "internet user" and "owner".
A really good exercise is to try to make it as simple as possible while still getting the concept across, then adding detail.
For the simplest example, you only need two. I've heard people explain it as "Reddit A" and "Reddit B", with some success.