this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
1743 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We need to escalate faster and hit harder in our tariff war with the US. That's the argument the most recent Hatchet episode. The reasoning makes sense:

  1. The uncertainty around tariffs means that businesses will decide to relocate away from Canada, even if tariffs are never fully implemented. It's just easier to set up shop in the US and skip the tariff risk entirely. The longer the uncertainty drags on, the worse Canada's position becomes.

  2. Trump and Musk are doing so many ridiculous things that the US public isn't focusing on the trade war with Canada, which means they aren't putting pressure on their representatives to end the trade war.

  3. As time goes on, Canada's unity will fracture. Individual provinces will cave as they receive individual concessions.

The argument is that we should keep export tariffs on potash, energy, and other stuff we're selling into the US so that there's significant short term pain. That pain will convince Trump and co to back off on tariffs and return to our previous relationship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

And medical isotopes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

More export tariffs on the essential things they can't quickly replace (and Belarus, Russia are only alternatives for Potash) even if it is a provincial tariff cash grab is good. Alberta tar sands oil has US customers that can only use that oil (until Venezuela is next US friend), and they need to spend $20B and 5 years building an alternate refinery. Uranium, also mostly SK, only has Russian alternatives.