this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
181 points (82.4% liked)

World News

35248 readers
438 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it's complicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kayjay@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

His reasoning was if the US didn’t make it, the Nazis would, and that would be even worse. He never wanted to make the bomb, it was just the lesser of two evils.

[–] RatherBeMTB 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Making the bomb was a good decision, dropping two over civilians after the war finished was genocide.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

But the war wasn't finished.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 2 points 2 years ago

The US was never trying to exterminate the Japanese race and culture, so no it wasn't genocide. It was a fucked up act of war, maybe you could even call it an atrocity, but calling it a genocide is wrong by definition.