this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
578 points (79.0% liked)
Political Memes
6398 readers
3462 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People didn't vote for Harris because her campaign sucked ass, it's her and her staff who failed to convince people to vote for her, not people who voiced their dissatisfaction with her proposed policy. They need to do better, and if they do, then people excercising their freedom of speech on the internet won't sway votes away from the party. Idea that people shouldn't be allowed to complain about the genocide because it voices loudly the dissatisfaction over the party actions and that may lead to lower voter turnout is flawed to it's core. Those comments are the symptom of the problem, the sign that there is something wrong with the way they directed the campaign, not the source of it. You will get nowhere by silencing the dissidents, you need to take away their reasons to complain, not their means. Until Dems learn this lesson, they won't win elections again, not with the antiestabilishment vibes and lack of trust towards the government that are prevailent im USA. Not only this messaging of censure won't work, it will only piss off the electorate and alienate them further. Before the elections I have assumed that this campaign to shame people into voting was a psy op, but it seems like it's actually their position on the matter, which definitely makes me think they're controlled opposition at this point. They can't actually think this kind of messaging helps them in any way, right? This arrogant approach is specifically why Republican electorate hates them. If they want to win, like, ever, they need to work on that.
I'm sorry their message didn't vibe with you but the Harris policy stances were all on point, minus that shit Walz had to say about Israeli borders. But the vast majority of Americans seemed unaware of the policy stances being on point because of the constant whinging of people online about how they don't trust her.
Here is an idea, buy Twitter, Meta, Google, WaPo, and TikTok and start propagandizing like the GOP had on their side. She'd probably win by 20 Mil minimum. That's how fucking easy it is to trick the USA, not even any politics involved, just fuck with the kid's vibe feeds and watch them destroy themselves. Even talking with you lowers my faith in humanity.
I've recently come around to this idea and I can't believe we haven't seen it more often. Facts don't matter. We need the media, in the unlikely event our democracy limps past this administration. We MUST control the media. That is LITERALLY all that matters.
They weren't unaware of the policy because of "whining", but because Dems failed to effectively communicate their proposals. They also failed to combat misinformation from the right, but this I'll forgive them for this one because at the very least they had opponent in that field that pushed back. That's not the case for their atrocious campaign that bled voters left and right.
If Americans are unaware or not happy with the candidate stances on various policies, that's entirely the candidate fault. And when the stances they're aware of are "I wouldn't do anything differently than Joe Biden" when JB had to be switched out from the race due to his unpopularity, then the candidate just digs their electoral grave.
You're entirely missing the point of my previous comment. Dems lost, because they couldn't make their voters feel like they were the right choice. You're sarcastic about "vibing" but it's exactly what required for politician to win an elections. People aren't wise and don't delve in deep in policy, as it is excellently shown by morons playing catch up with economic difficulties Trump's rule already brought. It's politician job to make their electorate trust them. It is their failure if they can't (or don't want to, if they are bought as controlled opposition) make that happen. You really can't say that "Dems had great campaign but people didn't like it" because it's precisely the popularity that makes the campaign great. And no, Harris and her team had terrible campaign, and lost to the opponent that was very easy to trip up and expose. You trying to blame people for not vibing with genocide doesn't help either. And if me telling you that Dems had bad campaign "lowers your faith in humanity", then it seems you might be in a cult and not be ready for a mature discussion about the direction that Dems politics will take them. You might want to have that checked out.
I think I'm justified in saying the politicians weren't the problem. We are. Demonstrably things would be much much much much better if we gave them the power to do something about it.
I'm all for building class consciousness and having people be involved deeply and personally in politics, but USA absolutely isn't there yet. You need populist messaging and need to make sure people see you in good light if you want to win elections. People didn't believe Harris nor Biden what they were saying about Trump, even though those things were true. People had few bad years economically, and while they knew it was due to covid, they blamed Dems. It was irrational, just as Trump's image as a working men ally, but the electorate isn't moved by rationality, but rather - you got it - vibes. Entire charade about inflation was a lie, but they failed to communicate that. They added fuel to the fire by even acknowledging the illegal immigrants narrative, despite everything showing that both legal and illegal immigrants commited far less crimes on average than USA born citizens. They cracked down on pro-palestinian protests and fed the antisemitic conspiracy theories. It goes on, and on, and on. And I get that you might disagree with me on whenever those things were good or not, but it doesn't matter, if they can't make more people think Dems have their best interests in mind. It's literally the single job they have during the campaign, and if they can't instill the feeling that people must vote for them or else fascists will win, then it's on them. They did it wrong. You can't expect people that doesn't care about politics to rally up behind them spontaneously, they need to be rallied. You can't expect people passionate about human lives not to protest a genocide, you need not to support it and not give them a reason to protest. And no, I'm not talking about protesting as in not voting - we already had several rounds of surveys that showed beyond any doubt, that those people in swing states voted almost exclusively for Harris, despite their grievances. It was mostly people who felt neither side had anything good to offer that failed to show up. And it's those people, who aren't interested in politics, who just want to do their thing, that Harris and her staff was supposed to convince, but the vibes were off, children died, protestors got maced and locked up, and lies about immigration and inflation were left not debunked. They came out strong after announcement of the ticket and got a record high funds from small value donations, but quickly changed their tune to pro-corporate businesses as usual, and the median voter visibly wasn't convinced by that. The surveys showed that people felt the economy was bad, so how could the messaging of "we won't change shit" convince them? Price gouging bit was good, too bad it was dropped stright away within a week. Tim Walz calling the fascist out was very good, but he got muzzled almost immediately. And then what, Liz Cheney? Bill Clinton telling Arabs in Michigan that "Jews were there first"? I mean, come on, you can't say you believe they did great and that their messaging was impeccable. And even if you somehow do, voters didn't, and you need at the very least to acknowledge that fact. The messaging was ineffectual, and that's on Dems. They also cultivated the image of government that is immune to change and stagnant, although that's not the issue with campaign but with their politics in general, and that made their electorate less interested when very radical change threatened them. Some people were radicalized specifically by this percieved stagnation and voted Trump just for something to change. Harris and her team had a lot of material to work with, but decided to keep to the old and tested playbook instead, which, judging by the elections results, was a mistake. People that were somewhat interested in politics and believed that Trump was bad, voted overwhelmingly for Harris, even if they disliked her or her campaign, but that's a drop im a bucket. Most people don't care, and you need politicians to reach them to make them care - or else they might blame them for something bad in their lives, maybe completely unrelated, maybe not, and just vote out of spite for the opposition, or maybe just wallow in apathy and not vote at all. I hope I made my point clearer, if it wasn't transparent previously.