this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
710 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

12579 readers
2601 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

As a person who is intrigued in linguistics, I wonder how ~~AI~~ LLMs will affect real languages. I wonder if there is any research papers on this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 27 minutes ago

I'm not aware of any paper about this; specially with how recent LLMs are, it's kind of hard to detect tendencies.

That said, if I had to take a guess, the impact of LLMs in language will be rather subtle:

  • Some words will become more common because bots use them a lot, and people become more aware of those words. "Delve" comes to my mind. (Urgh. I hate this word.)
  • Swearing will become more common too. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw an uptick of "fuck" and "shit" after ChatGPT was released. That's because those bot don't swear, so swearing is a good way to show "I'm human".
  • Idiosyncratic language might also increase, as a mix of the above and to avoid sounding "bland and bot-like". Including letting some small typos to go through on purpose.

Text-to-speech, mentioned by @[email protected], is another can of worms; it might reinforce non-common pronunciations until they become common. This should not be a big issue e.g. in Italian (that uses a mostly regular spelling), but it might be noticeable in English.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I dunno. If people can’t be bothered to write stuff anymore, I doubt they will be bothered to read it either. Also, the model deviates towards the mean by its very design.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If people can't be bothered to write anymore, then I will be very picky about what I read. I will probably do more research and make sure it is someone I trust to have written it themselves not relied on trash machines.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I've been picky about what I read ever since human written slop seemed to peak in the late 2010's, articles written by humans to appeal to search engines are almost just as worthless as AI slop.

This volume of garbage is certainly much more concerning, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite the same, but I'm waiting for the day when people will pronounce street names like the GPS, instead of how they are actually pronounced. The street Schoenherr, in my neck of the woods is pronounced "Shane urr (yes, like the planet Omicron Percii 8, cause Detroit (Day twah) is weird), but the GPS says "Shown her". I'm really curious to see how long it takes for the computer voice to be considered the correct one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

The GPS is definitely closer to the proper German pronunciation.