this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
655 points (98.7% liked)

World News

41336 readers
2908 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on the European Union, claiming the bloc was “formed to screw the United States.”

While details are pending, he suggested the levies would target cars and other imports. The EU, a major U.S. trading partner, has vowed immediate retaliation, with potential tariffs impacting $29.3 billion in exports.

French President Emmanuel Macron had attempted to dissuade Trump, urging focus on China instead.

Critics, including economists and conservative media, warn the tariffs could harm the U.S. economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The bat needs to bounce back and also hit the fascist ball in the face. Making things worse for everybody for no reason!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, we have retaliatory tariffs ready to go too, and I'm not sure they'd be any less damaging.

If we went nuclear shutting off power to New York and water to Seattle and Boise is a thing we could do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Do it. I know some people in New York who could use a reality check.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

And hopefully Trump would care? Last time we blacked them out (by accident) all hell broke loose in just a day, but they don't vote Republican.

Come to think of it, we could also cut off land access to Alaska. We're going to wait for him to escalate this first, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They backed off twice already. Its a joke at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Twice? Are you thinking of the first term thing?

The last time, it really looked like he panicked when the Dow (predictably, to everyone else) fell. If he blinks every time, yeah, it's never going to actually happen, although I can't see him deciding that actually he's wrong about tariffs being awesome.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

He pushed it by a month again. Now its for sure actually defenitely gonna happen in April Im serious guys no really.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Uhh, this CBC story is from a couple hours ago: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-tariff-march-4-1.7469928

He was also talking about some kind of additional tariff on April 2nd. On the auto industry (that will be shut down if he follows through anyway), IIRC. That being said, as CBC noted elsewhere he himself is bad at keeping his threats straight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Huh. There were some CBC articles floating around saying they were postponed again. I guess not? The articles are gone.

I feel like nobody knows wtf is going on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

After I sent this, I saw a clip about it. It looks like he did suggest it was all on April 2 in some interview. If he had it wrong, was deliberately being confusing or what is unclear, but it hardly matters.

We'll see what happens then, basically. Either way, we should be getting the hell away from American dependence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I feel like nobody knows wtf is going on.

That's exactly what they want.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Water to Seattle? Is this legit because Seattle has no shortage of precipitation or water AFAIK.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming their supply is related to the Colombia river system, yes. It looked like all of Washington was in the watershed in the map I saw.

How badly impacted they'd be by us messing with the upstream supply, I can't say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The Columbia flows through Eastern Washington, it's on the other side of a mountain range from Seattle. That's like threatening to cause an avalanche at Banff to hurt Vancouver.

In either case it's the environment that would bear the brunt of the conflict. If you want to hurt Seattle you could just raise our electric bill.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ah, my bad. So many mountain ranges makes it hard to keep track of what flows where. I'm a little unclear on the bits I've been through many times, even.

Well, IIRC the rest of Washington is a militia-ridden red state, so maybe that's even better. (Or am I thinking of Oregon?)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Oui oui le tariff oui