this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1469 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

6136 readers
1641 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1469
Murica (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/greentext
 

Anons argue in comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (18 children)

Someone can probably do the math, but i have a hunch that humans are technically not very fuel efficient if you look at calories burned pr the total mass being moved along.

But whatever it is biking is awesome, but being technically correct is even better.

[โ€“] licheas 1 points 2 months ago

something like 50-80 % of the energy we use (it depends on how active you are,) is used for just sustaining life (AKA your base metabolic rate.)

humans convert a bit less than 50% of the food-energy into a form we actually use- glucose. even though bicycles themselves are fairly efficient with the power put into them, humans themselves are not all that efficient. as for most effecient animals, that would probably be something like an albatross, which extracts energy from the wind to fly. (Specifically using a technique known as ridge lift. in the R/C world, the speed record is 548mph or so- set by a glider using similar techniques, and albatrosses can cross entire oceans.)

load more comments (17 replies)