this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
206 points (81.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36840 readers
663 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought I had finally found a healthy drink I liked with no artificial sweetness and they had to go and fuck it up

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 128 points 5 days ago (7 children)

On the plus side, stevia isn't artificial.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What is "artificial?"

It is all marketing BS

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Generally, artificial sweeteners are chemically synthesized while natural sweeteners are grown and refined.

I used to grow the stevia plant in my garden.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Does that matter at all?

In reality it is all arbitrary. By that definition table salt is artificial and poison nightshade is natural.

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/05/24/mythbusting-gone-wrong-how-dangerous-organic-pesticide-myth-began/

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago

Hey, you asked... I just answered.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Salt is also a poison

but "table salt" contains iodine, and that requires a refining brine which is an industrial process. Its natural but also not. When it comes down to it, lots of this is splitting hairs

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can you differentiate synthesis and refinement for me?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I would say synthesis in this example is the creation of a molecular compound from differing source materials while refinement is the isolation and concentration of an existing compound.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

That's precisely why I use it in my coffee and have for many years. However there's a big difference from one brand to another I've found. Sweet Leaf stevia drops are the only kind I'll use now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah , it’s from an actual plant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I drink a lot pineapple juice, would it be considered artificial sweetness?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

only for your cum

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Might not be artificial, but it doesn't look natural in sweetener form:

The process of extracting stevia -

Dried stevia leaves are subjected to purified water first. Then followed by a precipitation process with ferric chloride and calcium hydroxide to remove non-soluble plant materials & other impurities and follow filtration.

Then the leaf extract goes through an adsorption resin, which is used to trap the steviol glycosides of the leaf extract.

Afterward, wash the resin with ethanol to release steviol glycosides and decolorize the resulting solution with activated carbon to remove the colors in leaves, and then concentrated by evaporation.

Again, go through the process of decolorization, filtration and spray-drying. The spray-dried product is then combined with similarly processed additional extracts, dissolved in ethanol and/or methanol, crystallized and filtered. Finally, after further processes of crystallization, filtered and spray-dried to obtain pure stevioside.

Taken from here: https://foodadditives.net/natural-sweeteners/stevioside/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-1949

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You don't know how sugar is made, do you?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Or agave syrup apparently

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

They don't get simple chemistry is required to refine and purify stuff either apparently lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Dried stevia leaves are subjected to purified water first. Then followed by a precipitation process with ferric chloride and calcium hydroxide to remove non-soluble plant materials & other impurities and follow filtration.

So they’re washed with soap and water? Must we use the scariest language possible here?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Stevia is DISGUSTING and by far the worst non-sugar sweetener. Aspartame is good in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's interesting to read people's reactions to stevia. I don't seem to have the same reactions/aftertaste others point out.

I much prefer stevia over other sweeteners. I wonder if there is some sort of cilantro type thing going on.

Edit: Turns out stevia can taste different to other people!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Imo stevia is one of the best of the no calorie sweeteners, but since that entire category is absolutely abhorrent that's sort of like being called the fastest snail.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think we have to allow that when you’re raised on sugar like we all were, substitutes are never going to live up.

However lots of people throughout history didn’t have refined sugar. The ancient Egyptians for example. What would they have thought of stevia?

I once went on a strict no-carb diet for a few months and a stevia tea at the end of the day was a very enjoyable treat that I looked forward to. Now, having gone back to a normal diet, it doesn’t taste as good.

So I think habituation is a big part of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean of course, yes, but since I can't change my environment or context all I can do is speak on my own perspective informed my own context and experiences.

Like I'm not sure what your point is here, just that this obviously subjective topic is subjective? Yes, of course it is. And yes of course my response was likewise subjective, but given the inherent nature of the topic the idea of addending "in my opinion" to the end feels extremely unnecessary.

So again, I don't disagree with you, but this feels entirely non-sequitur to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m saying it’s even more than just subjective from one person to the next. I described how I changed my environment and context and how that had an effect. Your opinion can change.

I think you’re upsetting yourself trying to figure out if I’m agreeing or disagreeing with you but It’s a discussion. People chip in different bits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not upset, just confused. No ire anywhere, I assure you. Cheers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You disparaged the entire category. Which is a fairly common take. I’m saying that the moment we frame that category as sugar substitutes, in a highly sugar-driven world, the category is bound to compare poorly. It’s more than just subjective, it’s very slanted in one direction - for all of us.

But there are other frames of reference we could consider. Such as a world that isn’t saturated with sugar. Or even a personal diet that removes sugar as the frame of reference. “The examined life” that’s supposedly so worth living consists of trying not to just automatically react to the context we are in, but also consider alternatives, right?

You’re more than entitled to your opinion, and most share it. I’m just pointing out built-in biases that we all have on this question. If it was hard to figure out how my reply followed from your comment, it might be because I was trying to offer it without invalidating your opinion in any way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

That is clearer, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I've had a fresh stevia leaf before, totally amazingly delicious. However i can't stand it as a sweetener in drinks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Because it's subjective

[–] Reverendender 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And none of us can ever really know what anything actually tastes like to anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

And I think we have enough information to say definitively that not everyone experiences every taste exactly the same way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Stevia does have a bit of an aftertaste, but it's fine for me in, say, coffee.

IIRC, the major limiting issue with aspartame is that it's not heat-stable to the degree that sugar is, so there are a bunch of products that are made with sugar that you can't make with aspartame, problem for baking.

kagis

Yeah:

https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/aspartame-and-other-sweeteners-food

Aspartame is not heat stable and loses its sweetness when heated, so it typically isn’t used in baked goods.

There is no one alternative sweetener that has all of sugar's properties, just without the calories, which is what people really want.

Stevia has the aftertaste. Aspartame isn't heat stable. A lot of the sugar alcohols -- like xylitol, which is really common in sugar-free candy -- are laxatives, so if you eat that whole bag of candy, you are going to have horrendous diarrhea. You gotta use a patchwork of alternative sweeteners to replace sugar, based on the properties of a particular sugar use.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Bag of candy? Try a handful of sorbitol gummies and you will poop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I prefer stevia to just regular sugar. I go out of my way when buying soda to get ones with stevia because they just taste better.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't you just use sugar

If you are going to mistreat your body then go big or go home.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Added sugar is considerably worse for you than any zero calorie sweetener. Don't give me that IT'S CHEMICALS bullshit either. Aspartame is one of the most tested food additive world wide and it's not found to be unsafe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Aspartame gives me headaches. Like “I can’t interact with people” headaches. I’ve tried it a few times and it’s always directly afterwards.

That said Stevia gives me a reaction like I had 5x the same amount of sugar, so I just have to remember if I’m adding it to something don’t use much or I’ll be hyper and then crash terribly. But at least I don’t get headaches.

Sugar gives me no problems if I have it in moderation. I generally drink water, but if I have a soda, I have one and I’m done. It’s a treat, not a way of life. Drink water people, it’s actually good for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It is all really terrible for you in the long run. There are phycological impacts of sweetness.

Also drinking anything heavily flavored is problematic for your kidneys and heart. A little coffee or tea isn't a problem but if you start drinking Soda as a water replacement it will come back to bite you.

I do agree that terms "artificial", "chemicals", "non GMO" and "organic" are BS. Ultimately it is more phycological than anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

"its all bad in the long run" doesnt mean that one isnt significantly worse. If youre smoking, why not just do meth instead? Both will kill you.

I dont use sweeteners because of the aftertaste but I wont deny that sugar is much worse for my health. I dont consume enough to make it an actual problem though.

[–] Reverendender 4 points 5 days ago