this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
1361 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20328 readers
3136 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders is touring Iowa and Nebraska to rally against “the oligarchy,” aiming to energize progressives rather than launch a 2028 presidential bid.

At 83, he seeks to shape the Democratic Party’s future, arguing it lost in 2024 by neglecting working-class voters.

He hopes to influence budget battles and the 2026 midterms, targeting GOP lawmakers in battleground districts.

With Democrats lacking clear leadership, Sanders’ prominence and focus on economic inequality could define the party’s direction in the Trump-Musk era.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president. I can see her running in 2028 and getting the grassroots support that Bernie enjoyed.

If anyone can get the youth out to vote she can. they need to focus hard on getting people registered though.

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

I thought I saw AOC calling out how bad an idea that was, back when Harris did it, so I don't expect her to make the same mistake

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

"I think there's plenty of people that aren't happy about that, and I think that is part of the nature of putting together a coalition," Ocasio-Cortez, who clashed with Cheney when they were both in the House, said.

"I don't love it, but that doesn't mean that we aren't on the same team, and we aren't on the same page when it comes to who is unequivocally the better candidate in order to win the presidential election."

https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-liz-cheney-harris-campaign-trump-1976031

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My read on that statement is "I think this is a bad idea but in-fighting is the last thing we need right now if we want to avoid a Trump presidency."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

That’s my take as well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Afraid of competition on who can beat the republicans perhaps?

[–] xmunk 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Calling it out harder publicly during the election would have just made a Trump presidency more likely. It's similar to how Sanders shut up after Hillary stole the primary and threw his full weight behind her train wreck or a campaign.

People who actually give a shit don't want Trump to win and will do whatever they can to keep that from happening.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Yeah that played out great in 2016 and 2024...

Of course infighting is bad if it escalates. But candidates who are completely detached from reality, need a reality check.

If the Democrats hadn't waited until Summer to acknowledge what everyone saw with their own eyes, Biden being mentally declined well past the point of doing another 4 years, they could have built a proper campaign with a properly primaried candidate. But the oligarchy doesnt want that, because then topics like cost of living, housing health care and US funded genocide become topics for the Democratic base too.

And after Biden came the trainwreck of the Harris campaign. No Charisma, no political character, embracing the oligarchs coming out in support of her and finally closing the coffin with fucking war criminals Cheneys.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president.

She was old enough during the last election as well.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

aye, but there were no Democratic primaries in the last election

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

How about that.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They'll never allow AOC to win, just like they didn't allow Bernie.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose. It’s an uphill battle but one that we can win.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose.

If there's no primaries, no amount of support matters.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And if frogs had wings they wouldn't bump their ass when they jumped.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell there is no legal requirement for a party to run a primary. If I am missing something I am more than willing to amend my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

You are correct. That was a key part of the DNC defense in Sanders vs the DNC when they shafted him last time, in 2017. They are a private corporation with no responsibily to hold a fair primary. They argued that themeslve and won, so its estblished precedent now, and they know it.

https://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-lawsuit-presidential-primaries-bernie-sanders-supporters/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

We do have the technology to grow wings on frogs now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Granted the DNC "changed the rules" but are you forgetting the super-delegates overruling the majority votes in the primaries in 2016?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Looking at how shitty the democrats are now, they don’t have the ability to stop her.

She just needs to win the working class. There are far, far more of us than the elitist snobs currently running the show on both sides of the aisle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

In today's political climate, I think that's unfortunately true. It would take some drastic outreach, Obama levels of outreach and more, plus a ton of money to change peoples biases and opinions (again, as of today).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So watch them run a pair of old white men, or find another member of the Clinton family that hasn't had a go yet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well if we cant get Chelsea Clintin we can tap Hunter Biden right.

On a more serious note though, I would be comfortable with Michelle Obama from the getgo if she ran. I dont think she'd be easily controlled by the party. She had no time for their bullshit even when Obama was leading the party.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

She might be a popular option but she doesn't want the job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Kerry/Manchin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I personally would prefer a Bernie/AOC ticket, with Bernie giving a public contract that allows her to have him resigned if his mind starts going. IMO, it would be ideal if we could get 16 years of Bernie/AOC, and more if they can raise worthy successors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bernie will be 87 in 2028. Unfortunately i think Bernies chance at the presidency has been and gone. AOC/Walz would be nice. Walz proved him self to be likable in the Harris campaign but he doesn't have the profile that AOC does despite arguably having more experience

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Walz is the "Israel has the right to expand its borders" guy so you'd have to make him keep his mouth shut over Israel, but fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

He ticks the old white guy box so the racists and sexists can feel okay voting for them while still being left enough to not be too much of a drag on the resulting administration

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The biggest hurdle for AOC is she's a woman. She is an attractive woman, so that's beneficial, but I think America has made it abundantly clear that we are happy being misogynistic assholes that can't trust women with important decisions.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Can we pleas stop repeating this narrative? Hillary lost because she is an evil ghoul. Harris lost because she kept saying how she will continue the work of Biden who equally is an evil ghoul. And Harris invited Cheney to campaign with her, who is the father of evil ghouls in the 21. Century US politics.

There is countries more conservative than the US, where women have been Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors.

Far right and Nazis also dont have an issue with women leaders any more when it comes to elections. Look at Le Pen in France, Meloni in Italy and Weidel in Germany. Ffs Weidel is the nazi candidate in Germany and she is in a lesbian marriage with an Asian immigrant and raises two adopted children.

Gender has nothing to do with Harris loss and this narrative is kept being peddled to not face why people are alienated by her political program, character and donors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

They are more ok with women when those women are on their side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

You're correct that Hilary was awful and Kamala was uninspiring, but that's still glossing over the fact that they both lost to Donald Fucking Trump, and Kamala did so with the benefit of hindsight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

And she took that hindsight and ignored it

We told her how to win. She needed the working class. Instead she tried to win suburban wine moms and “sane” republicans.

America will vote for a woman if that woman doesn’t look down on them. Harris lost at that rally where she shouted down protesters with “I’m speaking”. She told us all she wasn’t listening.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Then maybe they shouldn't have run awful people.

The party pilloried Sanders in 2020 because he allegedly said the same thing to Warren. Now, since the party doesn't want to run AOC because they hate anyone to the left of Dick Goddamned Cheney now, suddenly the electorate isn't ready for a woman? Fuck that. Democratic voters no longer want yet another status quo military industrial corpodem.

Repeat yourself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

Notice how none of those are America? Evil ghouls but somehow evil men get voted in no problem? America well never vote in a Woman sorry.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think this ignores just how uninspiring Hillary and Kamala were.

Neither really spoke to the working class

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're correct that Hilary was awful and Kamala was uninspiring, but that's still glossing over the fact that they both lost to Donald Fucking Trump, and Kamala did so with the benefit of hindsight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Really just ctr+c/v'd your own comment, huh?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Huh... Just thought it was odd.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You're making me feel like I need to punch more sexists that I find. I'm really liking the idea of identifying as a fucking problem these days.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Gender has absolutely nothing to do with it. She is neoliberal garbage like the rest of the party