this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
64 points (93.2% liked)
And Finally...
1301 readers
96 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If they do have an actual 100% DNA match of 2 people who died over 100 years ago, it's pretty hard to fake even without chain of custody.
The question is, is that match actually new, because the article does say it was found because the descendants provided DNA. And that does sound like nothing is actually new and it's the very same test from the mitochondrial match a few years ago, which could just mean the descendants touched it.
100% DNA match would be conclusive if it were real, but it does sound like the historian is talking shit.