this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
64 points (93.2% liked)
And Finally...
1301 readers
96 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Original source is Daily Mail, so yeah.
The news story isn't the DNA results, they were published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences in 2019 (note the Expression of Concern published more recently, which seem to me require the tests to be rerun elsewhere), that news story is about the historian Russell Edwards pushing for an inquest to resolve this (which despite coming from the Daily Fail, I have no grounds to doubt). Given the issues with not having access to the raw DNA data (it happens, but it also makes things look a bit fishy), I suspect he needs to wait for a reanalysis or it would be thrown out.
See also:
The original source is author and researcher Russell Edwards who claims to have sufficient evidence.
And Weekly World News consistently ran stories about Bat Boy, that doesn't mean Bat Boy exists.
The article says the source is Russell Edwards, go look into his research if you want to know more about the claim and refute it, stop relying on the name of the news outlet.
Dude is an author so obviously he has reason to want this to make the news, you aren't wrong for not believing either of them, but it doesn't stop at the name of the website
But Bat Boy does exist