this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
508 points (98.3% liked)

News

25269 readers
3969 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes don’t work! Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into an SUV and a sedan and crashing into a large concrete barrier.

Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the car’s brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than $23,000 in damages and publicly apologize to the $1.1 trillion company.

Zhang is not the only one to find herself in the crosshairs of Tesla, which is led by Elon Musk, among the richest men in the world and a self-described “ free speech absolutist.” Over the last four years, Tesla has sued at least six car owners in China who had sudden vehicle malfunctions, quality complaints or accidents they claimed were caused by mechanical failures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s not whether the girls father is at fault, read the article. She put a lot of effort into publicly defaming the company to try to get damages. While it seems like they should have had a better response, including sharing the evidence they had, there has to be a better way to get justice

she draped her damaged car with a banner proclaiming “Tesla brake failure” in front of the Tesla dealership in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, some 200 km (124 miles) from her home. She sat on the Tesla’s roof and blared her protest through a bullhorn: “Tesla Model 3 brakes failed,” she said. “A family of four almost died.” The next month, she parked her damaged car outside an auto show in Zhengzhou

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

she draped her damaged car with a banner proclaiming “Tesla brake failure” in front of the Tesla dealership in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, some 200 km (124 miles) from her home. She sat on the Tesla’s roof and blared her protest through a bullhorn: “Tesla Model 3 brakes failed,” she said. “A family of four almost died.” The next month, she parked her damaged car outside an auto show in Zhengzhou

All those things are perfectly reasonable if there actually was a brake failure. That car almost killed her family. If Tesla doesn't want to be called out don't put dangerous vehicles on the road.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Of the many issues Tesla has, this is not one of them. They have the telemetry for proof: I blame them for not being more forthcoming with it, and hopefully that would be mandatory in any trial.

However you’re applying Western standards, and many other in this thread talk about “saving face” and that liable is not contingent on the truth in China. She knew what the law is and decided to ignore it hoping that a Western style pr protest would work. Apparently she was wrong, and the result is consistent with what she should have expected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they provided the data and it was reviewed by a neutral third party that found them not to be at fault fair enough but aren't those cars supposed to have self driving features that would prevent something like this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, if it senses something in the way, it first beeps, then will apply brakes.

  • Tesla has evidence either way, but is not sharing. They simply said no to paying damages.
  • The victim is trying to publicly shame Tesla into paying damages on the claim of a faulty vehicle

At least around here, you’d expect to sue, then Tesla would have to give evidence. I assume it’s same there

Instead the victim tried a public shaming without evidence. Here in the US, that’s not liable unless she knew it was false. Apparently there, damaging a corp’s reputation is liable, regardless of the truth (amusingly autocorrect keeps trying to spell “corp” as “corrupt”)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There does not need to be any kind of worldwide trend for one vehicle to have brake issues.

And as the other reply implied, I wouldn't trust a single fucking thing Tesla said about their telemetry data on the accident.

[–] sun_is_ra 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I did read the article. It says Tesla ~~would~~ would not release the log (initially). How do you prove that your electric car wasn't responding to brakes?

A good old mechanical car, it's as easy as taking it to mechanics but a high tech car? no so sure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

For a mechanical car, the only option is looking for failure points. I don’t know if there is relevant telemetry or who could access it.

Teslas also have a mostly mechanical brake that any mechanic can check for failures. However that will be trumped by the sensor telemetry only Tesla has access to.