this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
456 points (96.5% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4270 readers
15 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I do sometimes wonder if you could technically still run a working government off printing money, just recognizing that doing so didnt create more value, but instead acted as a form of taxation. Imagine a government that currently holds no significant fraction of its currency. It then prints an amount equal to what is currently in circulation, doubling the money supply and in doing so presumably halving the value of a given unit of that currency. Once it has done so, no new value is created, but that government has gone from having no significant fraction of the money in circulation, to having half of it, which it can now spend.

Suppose you did this predictably, you let everyone know that you will be increasing the money supply by x percent every year, and will be re-denominating it to avoid difficult to work with numbers at set intervals. Wouldnt you technically have a functioning system for extracting value from the economy to pay for government functions?

It might not be a very good system, since all it would effectively tax is people's savings of currency and not stuff like property, and you would have to set up things like employment contracts or debts to compensate for constant high inflation rates, but Im not sure I see a reason why it technically couldn't be done.

[–] AllHailZorglub 3 points 2 days ago

On a technical level, it would (probably) work. But I think it would feel terrible for the most people : the middle class would see it's savings melt away unless they lock a lot of it in investments, and people would have to reevaluate their value scale much more regularly than now. And the capital would likely not be "taxed" that in much in this setup.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You kinda just explained modern monetary theory. The US, UK, Canada, and a few other countries don't get money from taxes, they owe debt to themselves and earn it back through the next printing. There is a budgetary limit though, which is the amount of labor and resources available to the government

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Taxation is necessary to counter overaccumulation

[–] mindbleach 1 points 2 days ago

I've proposed doing this for cryptocurrency, but mostly to be immune to line-go-up behavior. Line goes down. So anyone holding these Beenz is encouraged to spend them, tout 'suite, or watch them dwindle to irrelevance. It's an aggressive recognition of how the utility of currency is exchange. And it lets you foment adoption by spraying a firehose of money and not really worrying where it ends up.

If you wanna have money just to sit there and look at it, buy shiny rocks.