this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
421 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19829 readers
3722 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Unless you’re trans, that isn’t your call to make. You don’t get to decide that it’s ok for people other than yourself to be exposed to slurs. Stay in your own lane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking as someone who has been subjected to slurs and violence for who and what I am - why should simple exposure to slurs be where we draw the line? For me it was almost always about the hatred behind them; discussions about someone else's hate for me are going to hit the same whether the words are printed or not.

I don't think the word should have been censored here - either print it or drop the quote.

Nor do I think a report critical of someone using slurs is normalizing the use of them by quoting them. This isn't the casual use of slurs in everyday language as a synonym for bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You’re free to argue for the normalising of slurs people level against you. I won’t stand in your way. But again, you don’t get to decide that slurs used against other people should be normalised, when the impact of those slurs isn’t felt by you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 52 minutes ago

Cool. Not at all what I was arguing - too hard to see from up on your high horse?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

But I'm just sitting here, genuinely wondering what the slur is she used, because I have no idea. I'm not well versed in trans slurs. Idk, news reporting should at least give me some way to find out... Like a spoiler tag to click on. Just... something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It was tranny bro. It's not that hard to figure out you could have just googled it and figured it out lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Thanks. It was answered a bit further up. But it's still a bit weird that I had to come to the comments and even here nobody wanted to say it :D I think the "not knowing from the article" is still valid. Not everyone knows everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Well I could have been more descriptive with my reasoning sorry.

What i was alluding to was a way to potentially find the answer even if no one in the comments helps you. Say we were talking about a homophobic slur f*****. You could google "6 letter homophobic word starting with f" and the answer (for me at least) is in the first link to Wikipedia.

Hope that helps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's like these people weren't even hearing people cuss in the 90s. Oh yeah that's right, I'm old.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

In the 90s, I barely even knew what the English language was.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Two of my children have trans boyfriends, and I am not advocating for us to go around insulting people with slurs. My comment was why are reporting sluring words. We should know what the bitch said. It's Congress we have right to know what they are saying and doing. Parts of lemmy seem to be turning into reddit. Next they ban people for speaking against fucking nazis or saying to punch a fucking nazi.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Two of my children have trans boyfriends

Cool, ask them how they feel about this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did they didn't know it was slur, but fuck they do now. See if you give a word power then it does what you attended. Why do you think the black community use the N word the way they do. It takes the power away from the word.

It words the old saying stick and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. It's powerful slogan, that I guess in today's age isn't used.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

the black community use the N word

Why are you censoring that? I thought it was for cowards and assholes?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Don't be asshole, I'm not typing it out because apparently that get me banned on here, even if I am not using it in a derogatory way. Which the whole fucking point I'm trying to make