this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
60 points (96.9% liked)
AskUSA
320 readers
30 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- [email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- [email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe I learned it wrong, but I always thought it was per account holder. The upper limit has always been well above what I'd ever be likely have on hand/liquid, anyway, so never bothered to clarify.
Looks like yeah, it is per depositor per bank:
https://www.fdic.gov/resources/deposit-insurance/faq
I have heard that financial managers can and do spread large dollar accounts out over multiple banks, though. There may also be something they can play with in regard to the "per ownership category" aspect, though.
Huh, I may be experiencing a Mandela effect.
Edit: So there’s a way to do it, but I’ll involve multiple banks, people, and/or account types. Still probably what rich people do.
Via: https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/123961/is-the-250-000-individual-fdic-limit-per-account-or-per-person
This is what I do. But, my motivation was different. If the government or some corporation wants my assets I've made it as complicated as I can for them to take them: many accounts, different types, in the US and abroad. There's certainly overhead. But, it's mostly administration and limitations on liquidity.