this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
90 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44612 readers
814 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greetings!

A friend of mine wants to be more secure and private in light of recent events in the USA.

They originally told me they were going to use telegram, in which I explained how Telegram is considered compromised, and Signal is far more secure to use.

But they want more detailed explanations then what I provided verbally. Please help me explain things better to them! โœจ

I am going to forward this thread to them, so they can see all your responses! And if you can, please cite!

Thank you! โœจ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Telegram for random public chatter/file storage(with password lock), talking to strangers without giving them your number. Signal for personal/private conversations.

Spread your data (encrypted or not) around, so a single entity doesn't own your digital life. Your device can handle 2 apps and don't give them permissions willy nilly. Geez, every one of these posts just wants to start a flame war.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

If you have a safe, but cannot open it, do you own the contents inside? Signal has no way of accessing your data, I would argue they don't own it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Signal supports username based chatting.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Behind those usernames, are phone numbers (meaning real identities) stored in signal's database.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As far as I know telegram requires a phone number too.

And the conversation was about "talking to strangers without giving them your number", not without giving signal nor telegram your number.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are far better privacy alternatives to both: matrix, xmpp, simplex all work well and don't require phone numbers or US-based hosting.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Where do you want to place the goal post?

We talked about comparing 2 applications. Commenter wasn't up-to-date and implied a falsehood, I corrected it as it is important for the discussion. Then you talk about something completely else and in context, implied a falsehood, I corrected that as it is important for the discussion. And now you are talking about something completely else again.

Please express your opinion. You can do it in this thread, even if it is off-topic, I don't care, but please stop acting like you are responding to me.