Comic Strips

13426 readers

3091 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

[email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
[email protected]: memes (you don't say!)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1623

Let's not jump to conclusions (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

152 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends on your goal. Short communications make bigger impacts.

[–] wolframhydroxide 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You're right! You know what I could have said instead?

Who could have guessed that the rich white South African would turn out to be a white supremacist?

See the flaw in using too few words?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see any flaw. The meaning of that sentence is very clear.

If the post lead with that then maybe there wouldn't be any complaints.

[–] wolframhydroxide 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It literally DOES start with that! That's the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You asked "Am wrong?".

The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That's what was wrong.

[–] wolframhydroxide 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don't understand the few words.