Am a chemist in your group. I read it the plumber way too. Took me several seconds to get it.
wolframhydroxide
As a leftist chemistry teacher, I read it as "having attained union", rather than "not ionized", so YMMV with this heuristic
ETA: (also, yeah, I have excellent job security until all public schools are abolished in the US)
Yeah, if you've ever read Cloud Atlas, it makes me wonder if David Mitchell was friends with a former collaborator of Zimmer's (or if the industry is so rife with such problems), because the way Zimmer appears to operate and aggrandize himself sure does have a whiff of Vyvyan Ayrs...
So, compare this contemporary review, which makes it clear (including a quote from Zimmer himself!) that while Zimmer, Djawadi, and others contributed leitmotifs and notes, the majority of composition was Badelt's. Now consider Zimmer's website's description, which invariably paints himself as the main composer of nearly every track, even claiming the title of primary composer, and seems to erase the contributions of Badelt at every opportunity.
So, I take any claims of Zimmer's greatness with a giant salt lick. I originally read another source (which I now am unable to locate) that claimed the only thing Zimmer wrote for the DaVinci Code was the main theme motif, much like "He's a Pirate" for the first pirates movie. I now generally assume that anything excellent "composed" by Zimmer was some other collaborator's work, Zimmer offered a chord or two, then used his ill-gotten fame to bully the less-famous collaborators to accept the title of second fiddle while Zimmer mimes the Solo in the spotlight.
From what I can tell, it seems like he takes credit for most of the work of his protégés. See: the DaVinci Code Soundtrack, for which he only wrote the main theme, or the Pirates of the Caribbean soundtrack, for which... You guessed it, he only wrote the main theme.
Since an observer traveling through space at the speed of light experiences no time from the beginning of their journey until they decelerate (since their 4-velocity vector has non-zero values only in the 3 dimensions of space), photons don't just arrive precisely when they mean to, from the moment they are emitted, they have already arrived.
I'd like to read more about this. Explain?
Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.
Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don't understand the few words.
It literally DOES start with that! That's the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
You're right! You know what I could have said instead?
Who could have guessed that the rich white South African would turn out to be a white supremacist?
See the flaw in using too few words?
I mean, you could think of it like rain. Imagine that you have a bucket, and it's out in a rainstorm. There's a plant in the bucket with some soil, and a tiny little pinhole in the bottom that lets out a couple of drips at any given time. Now, let's say you want to make sure that the plant gets just the right amount of water, so that it still gets the right amount of rain, but it doesn't flood and overpower the leak out of the bottom. What's the simplest solution? Figure out how quickly the rain is coming down, and then cover part of the bucket so you only get the right amount of rain, right? Now imagine that some hooligan comes by and decides to muck with your bucket, because for the slightest moment, it will bring their sad, shriveled heart some measure of joy to make your life worse. They decide to move the cover. Maybe they take it off entirely, and that would guarantee the plant would die, but they're a sick, evil little gobshite, so they only move it off when you're out for the day, and then they put it back when you get home. When you go into your house, they take off the cover again, letting in the full torrent of rain. You look at the bucket, and wonder why the plant is getting flooded. Why isn't the cover working anymore? Because it's only there to help some of the time, and the damage that's done while it's missing is piling up faster than the drain can sink it away
The plant is the entire world ecosystem, you are the careful equilibrium that has been in place since the Oligocene, the rain is sunlight, the cover is arctic ice, the little gobshite is the corporations and individuals that have decided that their personal aggrandizement is the only thing that matters.
You want real trouble? Now imagine that when the level of water reaches high enough in the bucket, the cover doesn't even fit anymore. That's what happens when the permafrost and methane hydrates release their payloads in the coming years. That way lies the Permian mass extinction.
If you thought this was promoting suicide, you either don't understand the connotation of a guillotine, or have been living under a rock for... the last hundred years