this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1568 readers
376 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Shortly after 2027" is a fun phrasing. Means "not before 2028", but mentioning "2027" so it doesn't seem so far away.

I interpret it as "please bro, keep the bubble going bro, just 3 more years bro, this time for real bro"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shortly after Musk puts people on Mars.

[–] Tar_alcaran 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I recall there being 2 starships on Mars by 2024.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

4 2026, 8 2028, 16 etc. (still amazed people don't call him out on his exponential bullshit)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It falls into a broader type of tech hype based in the idea that if it would be good for something to work a certain way then if we can make it work at all it will obviously work in that optimal way. Like, it would be cool if we could get exponential growth in our rockets somehow (Maybe they reproduce? Do the rockets fuck, Elon?) so therefore assuming we can get rockets at all we can definitely make them scale like that.

Call it the Milliways argument. Because if you've already done five thousand impossible things before breakfast, why not cap it off with lunch at the restaurant at the end of the universe?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

haha yeah I got very "we just need $29.95 billion bro just $29.95b trust me bro it'll be so intelligent bro just watch" impression from that as well