this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
26 points (93.3% liked)

Gaming

2656 readers
257 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I will get downvoted to hell probably, but I agree. I also think gaming pricing is out of date. $60 was set in the 90s. Maybe earlier. It has not kept up with inflation, while games have only gotten more expensive (albeit qso more popular). Not saying every game should be 100, but if it's worth 100 I'll gladly pay that much.

RDR2 was a masterpiece. It was worth 100 - maybe even more for how many hundreds of hours of enjoyment I got out of it.

Ubisoft on the other hand, makes what I put in the mid tier list. They're a fine way to waste time, but a far cry (get it) from a masterpiece. In a 60 world they're worth 40, in a 100 dollar world they're worth 60 I guess.

[–] _core 2 points 18 hours ago

$30 was in the 90s, $60 in the mid late 00s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why does the price have to increase? As you said, if rising sales covers the rise in development costs, then also raising the price on a digital good that is infinitely reproducible at no extra cost is just double dipping. These game publishers make crazy profits. Prices for everything don't have to just keep rising perpetually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Don't forget the drop in necessary production costs, tools have only gotten better and cheaper while corpos have valued less and less.