Fedigrow

993 readers

50 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

https://lemmy-federate.com/ to federate your community to a lot of instances
[email protected] to organize overall fediverse growth
[email protected] to keep tabs on where new users might come from :)

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

threelonmusketeers

Alright, so what is the current recommended way to share pictures on Lemmy? (feddit.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello everyone,

Following this post, it seems that quite a few users can't see catbox.moe pictures.

Catbox was my preferred option as they have a handy Firefox extension that allows to upload pictures with just a click, and get the link directly in the clipboard.

My understanding was also that by having the pictures on catbox, we avoided storing copies of pictures on every Lemmy instance. Is this still the case? I read a bit about proxying pictures (https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/4035) and it seems like this is more related to keep all media required by an instance locally, to avoid broken links.

So long story short: what should be the recommended way to share pictures on Lemmy?

Use a hoster like https://imgbb.com/
Upload pictures locally

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[email protected] implemented a custom image proxy for us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting, so from your admin perspective do you prefer users to use the Lemmy built-in image upload or use a link to an external hoster?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We let people use the built in uploader, then offload the uploaded image to the proxy, and then redirect requests for the uploaded image URL to the proxy. It was the only way we could really deal with the volume of images without having to either limit images or force them to be external

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting, but I guess if you had the choice that every user would use an external hoster, that would be easier for you?

I'm trying to ease the load on instance admins as well

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not a great user experience, so it's not an ideal approach IMO.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Indeed, but it's okay for me 😅