politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Oh it's war for team human now. I'd say that's a new one but it isn't. George Bush used that one in 2002.
Yep. Not war, more like excision.
ouch, you had at least a resemblance of an argument till the excision remark. War and battles aren't operating tables, ask anyone who has actually participated in a war and ask if that's possible. I doubt you would find a sane general in history who tells you combat is a precise procedure, it's messy and everyone gets hurt.
Oh I meant more like remove the CEOs and the surrounding structures. Doesn't even have to be violent.
Oh gotcha, too used to extremist civil war comments I guess lol so I apologize. I'm a huge proponent for Co-ops so I definitely get your thinking. It's one of the more peaceful paths I hope everyone gets into. Unions only work so far unless legislation gets involved (or things tend to get dicey and you're constantly battling a company daily).
I honestly believe that co-op communities that involve residency and occupation (separate entities though) is one of the only ways to protect yourself from capitalism, it's kinda crazy it hasn't worked on a large scale yet but I imagine competition both economically and policy wise tend to shut things down pretty quick if capitalism sees itself losing a foothold. Something like Land-o-Lake's company running in a town like the Bronx co-op city. Could have a whole slew of member owned companies servicing the area (food,transportation,etc), even have a Co-op that helps other co-ops come to fruition like a credit union (also a co-op) gives out loans.
It's all there, just no clue why it hasn't been implemented before. Got really heavy into researching and designing a small community area like a self-sustaining village that emphasizes co-op based services. There's been plenty of other examples and ones that exist but always seems to be some weird niche thing instead of just a regular ol' town of people that have different perspectives but can agree personal life shouldn't be a constant economical struggle for everyone. There's some weird gate-keeping or lack of social awareness around alternatives, both from mainstream and individuals so I don't get it.
No worries, I was saying violence is an answer if things get too far, but co-ops are much preferred, having done some electrical work for small ones in the north east. Refreshing to be treated like a human for once.
I think there's a marked lack of education about what they are/how they work, all it takes is one mutton-head to say it's communist and everyone scatters in fear.
Oh another one. You say you aren't a war hawk but damned if that doesn't sound exactly like some bangers from the past.
"It's just regime change"
""They'll be home by Christmas!"
Yep. I'm not ashamed of advocating destruction of the destroyers. Physics doesn't give a fuck, planet's getting too hot.
You're not going to solve the suffering of people under climate change by replacing it with the suffering of war.
I never said that, dummy.
I'm saying we gotta tear down these structures which reward destruction of our planet, oust the execs responsible for making these systems (McKinsey et al), and be prepared to counter armed police resistance as they are against making those changes.
Oh no I know you didn't. You believe you can have all the violence with none of the suffering.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Are you the same person I've been talking with all day?
No longer. Your illogical responses now go to the machine's void.
Enjoy.