this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
746 points (92.8% liked)

memes

11113 readers
3526 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course there's a distinction. A partial socialist/communist government has never implement full communism (seize the means of production and guarantee equal distribution of resources). That's only ever been done by force.

They have achieved things like universal health care and education, however, and for that we should all be grateful. IMHO the best case scenario really is a parliamentary system with a socialist majority to get these kind of things passed but leave a heavily regulated capitalist economic system in place.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are repeating false statements. There have been fully communist elected governments in Nepal, India, San Marino and probably more. In Spain we had a elected republican government run mainly by socialists and even an anarchist president.

The reason why most of them have been through a revolution is because they were declared illegal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nepal: Installed by force in the armed uprising against Rana rule in 1951

India: Never seized the means of production (or really got very powerful IMO)

San Marino: Attemped a coup and never seized the means of production.