this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
254 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19274 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President Biden expressed regret over appointing Merrick Garland as Attorney General, criticizing Garland’s slow action in prosecuting Donald Trump for the January 6 insurrection while aggressively pursuing cases against Hunter Biden.

Biden reportedly blamed former Chief of Staff Ron Klain for persuading him to choose Garland over other candidates, such as Doug Jones, who was seen as more politically assertive.

Many Democrats share Biden’s frustration, believing Garland’s cautious approach harmed efforts to hold Trump accountable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 109 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Uh yeah. Biden appointed a pretty nonpartisan AG in good faith that the 4 years of his term could be spent simmering down the hyperdivisionalism of the previous admin and return to status quo. Didn't read the room and let Trump build 4 years of momentum without so much as a speed bump along the way

[–] [email protected] 85 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Garland actively helped Trump. Slow walking an investigation for fear of being political is itself political. In treating Trump with kid gloves unlike any other perp was political.

Garland fucked over Biden- and America- pure and simple, because he was scared of an angry toddler.

And the worst of it was; that the reason behind selecting Garland wasn't because he was particularly qualified... but because republicans fucked his nomination to SCOTUS over and people (read: biden) felt bad.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Garland wasn’t scared, he was on his side.

EDIT: this is why Kamala lost the libs when she was like “I’ll put republicans in my cabinet!”

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago

this is why Kamala lost the libs when she was like “I’ll put republicans in my cabinet!”

That was one of the most infuriating things about her campaign. Even if she was saying that just somehow troll the hard right or the die-hard magabrainz, it was still just so fucking stupid. Not one Democrat wanted to hear shit like that, they wanted someone that would fight the hell back against these assholes, not swing the door open and invite the vampires into your household, FFS.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago

It was amazing watching centrists on lemmy who didn't want the support for their pet genocide to end bein' like "She's the vice president! She can't differ from Biden in any way at all ever!" fall silent when she decided that she needed to run to Biden's right.

[–] winterayars 12 points 5 days ago

Let's not forget, on that note: Biden picking him was bad but so was Obama nominating him to the SCOTUS to begin with. Replacement for Scalia or not, we see what that led to. Garland getting on the Court wouldn't really be making a difference there either.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Once again, our side plays by the rules and does "ethical" stuff while the GOP continues to fuck around while we all find out. These next four years are going to be insane.

[–] winterayars 47 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Dems don't even play by the rules. They play by some made up rules that exist only in their heads and boil down to "you're not allowed to oppose the Republicans in any way that matters". There's tons of legal and ethical stuff Biden could have done in the last four years and here we are, sitting on our asses in the sinking ship, waiting for the water to rush in and drown us all.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm with you there. I am still haunted by the idiotic things we've done to shoot ourselves in the foot, though. Time and time again, we listen to people wanting to do bipartisanship from the Dem side, and only be met by betrayal. Anybody remember Al Franken and what a self-own it was for him to be forced out?

I can go on and on, but we don't learn and our own don't want to do honest reflection.

Fuck it.

[–] winterayars 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, getting rid of Franken was reasonable. Refusing to challenge the Republican creeps has... well... resulted in a government of mostly creeps and that's not where i want to be. (Admittedly that specific piece is not specifically the Democratic Party's fault, though they could have done more. Not using the moral leverage they got by booting Franken was an unforced error.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Franken was ousted for a harmless joke in which all parties were privy. In the grand scheme of things, he would have done more good in office than out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Franken should have been running for President. Smart, incisive, charismatic. Everything we needed.

Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yet, here we are. Tangerine Gorilla is the next president in line and a hoard of supplicant chimpanzees with the complacent centrist democrats incapable of critical reflection propping it up.

Fuck.

Wake up, assholes. Wake the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

We could have the 25 amendment if he got his head out of his ass.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not even playing ethical. Garland's stance was effectively that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted because it might look bad. That's the opposite of a strict ethical code.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Garland is a piece of shit who slow-rolled the prosecution of Trump for years for whatever convoluted political plan he had in mind. I've been baffled by this since 2020. Trump should have been indicted after Jan 6, not within striking distance of the election.

Merrick Garland had to have been an agent for the Trump team in some shape or form.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These next however many years America has left are going to be insane. This won't end in 4 years. Garland and the Democrats made sure a dictator was elected and the Republicans will never give up power again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Exactly why I'm angry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Been that way since Obama. Turns out they aren't "our side", they're the party of conservativism, neoconservativism and just happy to rely on minority votes and therefore focus on minority rights.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I use the term loosely, but as you can see with the reactions I get from others, you're either all on board or apparently they think you're a Trumper. Which takes me back to the "nuance" argument I had. Which is probably synonymous with critical thinking in this case.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Americans are terrified of Trump, which is understandable, but they then demand that a free pass be given to his opponents, up to and including their acts of genocide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Biden should be in prison for breaking US laws saying he cant aid any regime thats plausibly accused of genocide. Our party doesnt always play by the rules and do ethical stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No shit. But look how people reacted when I criticized them elsewhere in this conversation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yea, I hear ya. Just ignore them. I always say dont take any criticism or feedback from people you dont respect. I dont respect centrists or people who let the DNC box them in so they can vote for an AIPAC genocide (also dont respect republicans). It didnt thave to be this way but Harris/Biden and the DNC made it this way with their hostage taking and ignoring their base on almost every key issue polled. So they deserve whats coming to them, and Harris/Biden/centrist leaders all deserve to leave politics for good. Unfortunately progressives and youth cant win unless we form a coalition with the centrists, and neither can they win without us, but they pretend we owe them votes even when they sell out and make absurd choices. Thats not the way a coalition works. Dumb centrists need to learn and their childishly refusing to acknowledge this reality doesnt change the reality. Let them swim in the sewage with the rest of us until they learn they arent emperors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I really wish I could Homer my way into a hedge.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago

An apolitical AG would have prosecuted Trump. Multiple times. Garland was a very political AG.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Garland is a partisan Republican.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

It's weird how this "centrist" was rejected by the qons just to give a middle finger to the Black guy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Biden appointed a Republican to slow walk the trump investigation so that Biden could run as second worst to trump again.

Garland did what he was hired to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Not sure if true, but a very interesting thought. Wheels within wheels, sort of. I'm not sure people are that "good" at planning though.