this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
382 points (94.8% liked)

memes

10661 readers
2112 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'm pretty sure it's AI generated; which is really weird because I'm pretty sure there are plenty of 50's era images featuring a smiling woman in the kitchen.

[–] zarkanian 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but you'd have to search for those, and who has time for that in 2024?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

To be fair, making if physically cursed instead of only conceptually is an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was going to say. Even without the usual tells I just could feel that it seemed AI. It's that glossiness I think; even with a filter over top of it it looks off.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It has plenty of the usual tells. Just look at the stovetop. Look at the casserols and details on the wall

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For me it's the waist. It's really thin, which would be ok for a 60's illustration but the contour of her dress doesn't match before and after the forearm.

[–] anomnom 3 points 14 hours ago

The shadow for the cupboard door knob above the text is a tell, as is the stove top and each knob on the range being different.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zarkanian 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not 100%. The text is legible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Sure, the text might be added on top by someone

[–] where_am_i 1 points 15 hours ago

And this image is just a clever rehash of those 🤷

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This looks like bad human art not bad AI art, but I may be wrong

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

0 reverse image search results. the fucked up shadows and broken waist/skirt are what confirm it as AI for me—not even the most lazy human artist who can render this well would draw those so poorly.