this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
342 points (99.7% liked)

Nonsense

0 readers
1109 users here now

funny, silly, whatevs.

Rules

keep it comedic

founded 3 days ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the definition of vegetable is very vague. anything from a plant can be vegetable.

i personally prefer using words like root, leaves, fruits and nuts, but strawberries put that to the test

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Anything from a plant can be a vegetable

Is bread a vegetable because it is made of wheat?

Edit: you can downvote me but you're still incorrect. It isn't vague and potato is objectively not a vegetable. Same goes for grains like wheat, corn, and rice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Even if i consider potatoes vegetables, i wouldnt consider vodka a vegetable because its made out of potatoes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Tell that to the National Potato Council. Potatoes may take the place of grains in some dishes, but that doesn't make them a grain. Radishes, beets, turnips, and other tubers may also be used as a starchy base for a dish, but I doubt you'd question the legitimacy of them as vegetables

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're also dumb and wrong from the very loose culinary definition btw, potatoes aren't a grain, they fall under the "root VEGETABLE" category along with beets, carrots, onions etc...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Never did I claim that a potato is a grain. Culinarily, I am correct.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So you might be arguing with the wrong person if you want to pull culinary technicalities. When I open my copy of Escoffier Le Guide Culinaire to page 498 I find Potatoes listed in the vegetables section

But wait, let me check my copy of Jaques Pepins Complete Techniques ah, okay, on page 323 he describes potatoes as "a versatile vegetable". Maybe The Joy of Cooking? Ah, here, on page 245, under vegetables, and a root vegetable puree recipe featuring potatoes. Fascinating...

I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the CIA textbook currently though I'm fixing that soon, and my Japanese cooking technique textbooks don't specifically categorize potatoes. Want me to get back to you when I can borrow a copy of Modernist Cuisine from my chef friend?

[–] slackassassin 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mf busted out the hard copy sources from the culinary greats. I'm dead, lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Enjoy eating a baked potato and thinking you've had your serving of veggies for the day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh, are we moving the goalposts to nutrition? Because here's some info about STARCHY VS NON-STARCHY VEGETABLES https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/starchy-vs-non-starchy-vegetables#definition

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even the meme in the OP is about nutrition and is being tongue in cheek by stretching the definition of vegetable to potatoes. That's literally the joke...

My comment on the OP was addressing nutrition, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, famed nutritionist Martha Stewart 🤡

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly the joke...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's where the goalpost has always been. Food is about nutrition, see my other comment where I define vegetables based on food groups

A potato objectively is not a vegetable, culinarily

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

see my other comment where I define vegetables

See this is why you're arguing with everyone and coming across as (at best) a troll


you've defined your position to be correct, which of course means in your world you cannot possibly be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
  1. I was asked to give my definition of a vegetable.

  2. I was only referencing that as evidence that my comments have always been in the context of nutrition, in response to being wrongly accused of moving the goalpost when the other commenter's argument fell apart.

If you eat a baked potato, have you eaten a daily serving of vegetables? Yes or no? I'm literally just correct

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

I mean you could eat a pizza and eat your daily serving of vegetables, but despite the memes from 10 years ago I don't think anyone would seriously consider a pizza to be a vegetable.

You could also just take vitamins and fiber supplements and do the same thing. If you drink a smoothie of multivitamins and metamucil, have you eaten your daily serving of vegetables?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am curious what your define it as, because you've ruled out vegetable and grain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Starch" isn't a plant categorization at all, stupid. In fact, pretty much any source you can find will tell you potatoes are classified as a vegetable, and while most veggies are lower in starch, a great many are considered starchy vegetables, Including peas. A vegetable having starch in it doesn't make it a starch. That's like calling Cabbage a fiber instead of a vegetable, because it has a bunch in it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

You're speaking stupidly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetable

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vegetable

a usually herbaceous plant (such as the cabbage, bean, or potato) grown for an edible part that is usually eaten as part of a meal

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just curious, what would you define as a vegetable?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Culinarily, you can define vegetables using the basic food groups. Grains and starches are a distinct group and not part of the vegetable food group, despite the fact that they come from plants. It is easy to see that not all food that is plant-based is, culinarily, a "vegetable" when you consider things like fruits and nuts, which people have no trouble distinguishing from vegetables.

And yes, many things we culinarily consider vegetables actually fall under the scientific definition of fruit, and some "fruits" do not fall under that definition.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Starches are just something a vegetable has, though, not something they are. Like protein and fiber.

If you exclude anything with starch from being vegetables, you're also excluding beans, squash, lentils, carrots, peas, parsnips, corn, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Corn is not a vegetable, it is grain. Is rice a vegetable? No.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I think the distinction you're thinking of is when something is milled. Wheat is milled into flour. Rice is milled to remove the husks. Corn is milled into meal. At that point you're not eating the plant, you're eating a processed plant product. Of those three, corn is the only one that can really be eaten as-is, so perhaps the distinction of when it's a grain or a vegetable is more about if it was dried and milled first.

But all of that seems unrelated to potatoes, which are roots. You can make bread out of potatoes, and I don't think anyone would try to argue that potato bread somehow counts as a vegetable. But a potato on its own, minimally processed and eaten relatively whole, seems to fit the definition of a vegetable by most definitions, culinary or otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Doesn't work as well after they're dead.