News

23600 readers

3387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

218

‘What a circus’: eligible US voters on why they didn’t vote in the 2024 presidential election (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 days ago by HellsBelle to c/[email protected]

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The 2024 US presidential election had been widely characterized as one of the most consequential political contests in recent US history. Although turnout was high for a presidential election – almost matching the levels of 2020 – it is estimated that close to 90 million Americans, roughly 36% of the eligible voting age population, did not vote. This number is greater than the number of people who voted for either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

More than a month on from polling day, eligible US voters from across the country as well as other parts of the world got in touch with the Guardian to share why they did not vote.

Scores of people said they had not turned out as they felt their vote would not matter because of the electoral college system, since they lived in a safely blue or red state. This included a number of people who nonetheless had voted in the 2020 and 2016 elections.

While various previous Democratic voters said they had abstained this time due to the Harris campaign’s stance on Israel or for other policy reasons, a number of people in this camp said they would have voted for the vice-president had they lived in a swing state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Pivoting from Biden to Harris guaranteed a Trump victory.

We need a replacement for the democrat party.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Biden had been showing his age for almost a year before he dropped out. That debate was his last chance to show he wasn't having a massive mental decline, and he failed. There was no way he could have won against Trump after that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I actually disagree. I think the debate was blown way out of proportion and most people who would've voted for him prior would've still voted to him after.

It's important to acknowledge that there are a lot of liars on the internet. It's easy to make it appear that a bunch of people jumped ship from biden after the debate when you see waves of trolls saying "yeah, I was gonna vote for Biden but not after that debate!" Meanwhile, they were going to vote for Trump all along.

That said, I still don't think Biden had a great shot at winning because he doesn't serve the working class or exploit their emotions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Pivoting to Biden in 2020 is what really sank the party in 2024. Covid won 2020 for Biden, but he thought he was something special so in 2024 he desperately clung onto power until his mental decline was too obvious for even party diehards to deny and then the party scrambled to push through Harris who was forced to adopt that bonehead's general rhetoric. Biden would've lost things even harder. The party really fucked itself with Biden, but I'm sure the party thinks it was all worth it to prevent a Bernie victory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Harris overtook Biden's polling numbers quite quickly. Also, I find that Biden's pardoning of the "kids4cash" judge demonstrates some extreme incompetence and tone deafness".