this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
742 points (96.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9870 readers
719 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There is no Self Defense when you seek conflict.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Court entirely disagreed with your scenario, even the survivor admitted he was attacking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The court was wrong. Anyone not blinded by ideology can see Rittenhouse crossed state lines to go cause trouble with a gun. His fig leaf of a cover blew apart and conservatives pretended it still applied.

Furthermore despite conservative judges protecting attackers this must be a tenet of self defense, otherwise there is no longer any way to convict someone of murder, except the arbitrary denial of self defense as an argument to defendants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was the survivor also lying, you propaganda pushing piece of shit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing that happened after he grabbed a gun and went to the protest matters. If he hadn't gone there with the intent of using his gun none of this would have happened. He is the instigating force and cannot claim self defense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

And yet, look what happened in court, because he actually did nothing of the sort. Do you not understand anything about how the laws work or what happened there? (Don't answer, that was rhetorical. "Rhetorical" means a question for conversational effect, not an actual request for an answer. The previous sentence contains condescension, and I'm just going to assume you need an definition for that also, as you seem to have no idea of what goes on at all.)

[–] Tb0n3 1 points 4 days ago

I'm pretty sure you're mistaken. Carrying a gun is not equal to being attacked with a skateboard. One is a violent act the other is a constitutionaly protected act with no violence. Kyle may have made questionable decisions but he acted in self-defense, and his trial bore that out. You can't attack somebody just because you're afraid of them or don't like them.