Jamablaya

And yet, look what happened in court, because he actually did nothing of the sort. Do you not understand anything about how the laws work or what happened there? (Don't answer, that was rhetorical. "Rhetorical" means a question for conversational effect, not an actual request for an answer. The previous sentence contains condescension, and I'm just going to assume you need an definition for that also, as you seem to have no idea of what goes on at all.)

no, i was trying to call you a moron without saying it, but i guess i have to be forthright. MORON. Do you get the point now?

Was the survivor also lying, you propaganda pushing piece of shit?

try wikipedia, moron

my morality rarely aligns to law

yeah that was the kicker,

as a tourist, with no health insurance, full billing but it'll be actual at cost, not the inflated number used down south for the hospital company and insurance companies to argue over. Broken leg, say, probably set you back 5000 Canadian depending. Similar to the states at final billing.

well you've certainly refuted my theory

Ok we're done here, you can't not lie about the actual events and I won't longer entertain political discussion with those that can't at least do that. BTW, it's really funny you calling me the authoritarian, considering your (see, not "you're", buddy) evident ideology. Do you seriously not know the Rittenhouse trial is long, long over? JFC.

No, dude. you aren't. You've already exposed yourself even if you didn't realize it then and want to backtrack now. Just another jerk off whose idea of right and wrong is which team.

The smart ones make sure their insurance covers international travel, same as I did.

It's when a jury decides the person charged did commit the crime, but they for what ever reason thinks under the circumstances, he should be acquitted anyways. When you do hear about it, it's often in the context of some parent being acquitted for murdering a pedophile, that interfered with the killers kids.

Sure looks like it huh?