this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
276 points (99.3% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2003 readers
1206 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't understand how this isn't illegal in some way. It's misrepresentation of your goals in taking the position. Unless she's just going to call herself a Republican but vote with Democrat lines, which would be even weirder.
Who is going to arrest her? DeSantis?
She's a Cuban ex-pat whose harshest criticism of the GOP was that they were too much like Fidel Castro. She ran unopposed twice, after the Dems cancelled the primary and let her waltz through unopposed. Now she's facing an entrenched majority GOP that happily rewards turncoats and completely freezes out the rump opposition. This is her last term in office before retirement, so she can flip the bird to her constituents and cash out at last. Why are you surprised she flipped?
Not surprised, just calling it as I see it, despicable and deplorable.
It's the inherent flaw in representative democracy. You elect a person and empower them to just do whatever they think is best, with the assumption they'll do what they said and what you supported them for, but there's no enforcement or law requiring it. They just presumably want to be reelected, but if the deal is good enough or they think they can get reelected some other way, they can flip you off and you're screwed.
This is why, when George Santos was found to be lying, the argument that there's no need to expel him from Congress because people will unelect him is bullshit. George Santos ran on being a completely different person than he turned out to be and so completely misrepresented himself. This is very much what what's her face OP posted did. Waiting until the next election cycle for that position doesn't really do the Justice needed, does it?
A politician? Misrepresenting their goals? Changing them after being elected? Impossible!
You must be young.
Not young. I get your point, but I think you understand mine. There's a huge difference between not fulfilling campaign promises and totally voting opposite the party you were elected under. So I toss it back...do you think this is fine or okay, or even typical, and we should just shrug it off?
I think it's typical, yeah. I don't think it's fine. I have no expectation of things ever being fine in government so I'm hardly surprised.
I also think it's less egregious (so far) than, for example, Obama running on "hope and change" then renewing or expanding all of Bush's worst excesses, the things we hoped he would change.
Tell us what you would accept from the choices available.
I've accepted there isn't fuck-all I can do about it if that's what you mean
Political parties aren’t technically part of the government. Why would lying to them be a crime?
What law was broken? And if there isn't one (there isn't), how would you craft such a law?
The only thing that I can think of is some type of vote of no-confidence by the people who were tricked. Maybe a way to petition through the state to call for a new vote. Something besides some letters and phone calls that will be ignored, and wait another election cycle.