Privacy

32383 readers

151 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

765

Revolut, McDonald's, and Authy have banned the use of GrapheneOS. (grapheneos.org)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

288 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of 'non-google' approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that's true or not..

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I can't prove it, but I'm 99% sure Lyft did the same thing. Had a perfect rating (and was even a driver at one point), and they banned me without explanation right after I switched to GrapheneOS.

Emailed them a few times asking for the reason, and they refused to tell me.

_"Legally, we cannot release any additional information except that we found your account to be violating our Terms of Service.

We will be in touch if we are able to reopen your account in the future."_

There's absolutely nothing else that they could've misconstrued as "violating the Terms of Service."

If Uber's going down the same path, no more ride-sharing for me I guess. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

There's always traditional taxis I guess

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Uber still works under Lineage. Can't imagine what the heck they are trying to block

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

No idea. Gonna try to stick to the web app instead and hold off updating the native mobile app for as long as possible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

A valid excuse may be that they want to prevent GPS spoofing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's no reason a company couldn't release the info legally unless it was under something like AML (anti money laundering) laws and you were flagged as a criminal. They legally can't disclose why in that case.

Using a different OS isn't reason enough, if they were telling the truth about the legal restrictions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do the web apps not still work? I’ve booked Uber eats from a computer in the past, I’m imaging the phone browser version might still function. I don’t have lyft in my country to know tho.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'll have to try next time and report back. Honestly don't use ride sharing too often. I prefer public transport.