this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
63 points (88.9% liked)

Privacy

4359 readers
61 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
63
Why I Trust Signal: My Go-To for Secure Messaging - YouTube (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that's fair, maybe I should have said efforts like Matrix.

But I'd also view a singular commercial company's no-cost product as not being a long term bet on privacy/anonymity.

[–] Kalcifer -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But I’d also view a singular commercial company’s no-cost product as not being a long term bet on privacy/anonymity.

Oh I completely agree with the idea that a federated service, like Matrix ^[1]^, is far preferable to a centralized one, eg Discord ^[2]^; I have no issue with using Matrix (I personally use it extensively) I just think one should be careful with the idea of using it with the intent of being anonymous.

References

  1. "Matrix Specification". Matrix Foundation. Version: 1.12. Accessed: 2024-12-09T06:41Z. https://spec.matrix.org/latest/.

    Matrix defines a set of open APIs for decentralised communication, suitable for securely publishing, persisting and subscribing to data over a global open federation of servers with no single point of control. […]

  2. "Discord". Wikipedia. Published: 2024-12-07T05:34Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:03Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discord#Features.

      • The license is listed as "proprietary". This was interpreted to mean that Discord is the owner of all of their infrastructure.