Asklemmy

44132 readers

616 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

When can we expect Executives with robot security? (reddthat.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is a collection of fragmented thoughts brought on by recent events during a long drive. It’s not meant to be “doom and gloom” serious…

Is it correct to expect an uptick in private security firms for executive protection?

Is it correct to assume that some of the ultra rich have their own “private military/force”?

How long until we see executives with some form of robotic security accompanying them?

I can’t tell if we’d expect to see them used in a military capacity first or if the military has too meet redundancy needs first – making it more likely for private ownership first.

I know we’ve seen examples of robodogs on a golf course - but when might an executive be strolling the streets with some form of automated protection?

What might be more realistic near term, or a decade into the future? Hiring soldiers/private-security would still make the most sense?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man, I don't know... the last few decades have shown humans to be surprisingly easy to "hack"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Different.

You need to constantly bombard a human with propaganda. You cant flip a human around overnight.

A robot can be all good and obedient for its entire existence, then suddenly a small script can turn them to betray the person it's supposed to serve.

If you are able to select a few loyal humans, indoctrinate them from the beginning, and censor them from access to any opposing views, then you are like 99% safe assuming they are professionally trained bodyguards, and you are definitely much safer than with robot bodyguards.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You don't even need any indoctrination. Just compensate them better than everyone else and they'll give their life for you. That's the power of money.