this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
120 points (99.2% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3895 readers
1323 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The Prime Directive is immoral.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ehhh not really, it's a good policy to have for most cases, but it IS way too restrictive and there absolutely should be more flexibility.

For example, if a pre-warp civilization about to go extinct because of a giant ass asteroid. Not a whole lot of good protecting their culture is going to do when they're extinct.

But just giving a random pre-warp civilization replicator tech for funsies would be devastating. Just think, what would happen if aliens came and gave replicator tech to our current governments? They'd fucking replicator weapons or some shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But what if that alien species you saved from the asteroid becomes the next Space Hitler?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's on them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Does the asteroid even count as interference? If the civilization is sufficiently primitive, you can save them from an asteroid without them noticing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This thought experiment is pretty easy:

if you could alleviate a large amout of suffering and death for a sentient species at little to no cost to yourself, would you?

If you can do that so trivially that it has no negative impact on you, and you do not do it, are you acting ethically?

The answers will be yes and no for most people. To me that makes it clear that neither the Prime Directive nor any kind of all-powerful deity can be moral, at least not humanly moral.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

How is this hypothetical a false premise?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ENT s1e13 "Dear Doctor" does a great job exploring the arguments that would result in its formation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's been a long ... time .. since I saw ENT, and I couldn't recall that episode, so I went and read a plot summary and still had a hard time recalling it.

The plot summary makes it seem, to me at least, like a very specific and constructed scenario to try to justify it ex-post-facto in canon.

My major issue with the directive is how general and unnuanced it is. Of course there are cases where you would not want to intervene because of some unique issue. To avoid helping for fear of potential futures is cowardly and unjustified, however.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's not just contrived it's unethical in the episode that's supposed to be justifying it. They're withholding a cure based on "well, fate wants you all to die." And yes, I'm going with fate and not evolution because that's not how evolution works dammit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Amoral, maybe. I know it's dealt with in the lore, but I'd like to think someone at Starfleet read Roadside Picnic and thought, "well, we don't want that."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting. So District 9, but more bleak.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was colonialism moral? One of the way european empires justified it was that they were uplifting Africa.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When someone lies about helping, that's not what I am talking about.

This is a thought experiment based on a hyper advanced society capable of easily solving many problems. We don't have that and never have on this planet.

🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that the people doing harm often don't know the difference. I had the "pleasure" of meeting with several people involved in the Portuguese colonial administration in 1960s and 1970s and most of them seem to genuinely believe they were working to better the colonized people's lives.

Missionaries are committing a form of genocide that they believe is for the greater good.

That's the reason that we have prime directive-like protocols regarding uncontacted peoples in most of the places where they still exist.

If we struggle to make ethical first contact with "less advanced" societies from our own species, what chance would we stand with an alien society?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If an "uncontacted" group here on earth suddenly arrived at the nearest "civilized" settlement and asked for help curing a disease ravaging their people, would you advocate we turn away?

What if the disease is something easily cured with modern medicine?

A blanket rule to not "interfere" with civilizations based on an arbitrary criteria (in ST: warp capable) is immoral.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a misrepresentation of the Prime Directive. The prime directive has an exception for cases where societies already knows about interstellar civilizations and Starfleet can intervene if it's contacted first. See Saru's case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

The arbitrary criteria I spoke of is slightly different. 🤷‍♂️