this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
406 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5933 readers
2916 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.

[–] ShareMySims 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that's your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

ovaries are just nuts in the inside

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

I Snickers at this comment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Colloquial "sexism" is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely

[–] ShareMySims 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And if you knew anything about either, you'd know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid

https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/

https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a

[–] TriflingToad 2 points 4 days ago

yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥

load more comments (9 replies)